Date: 2005-06-03 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
I'm fine with her holding that opinion, but I think she should both step down and stop voting.

Date: 2005-06-03 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azarias.livejournal.com
if it were being considered today she would vote against it.

HAHAHAHA.

Oh, those Republicans. Masters of satire!

Date: 2005-06-03 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciara-belle.livejournal.com
So she's a female elected official...who doesn't think women should vote or hold government office.

*brain go boom*

I mean, it's one thing to be a private citizen and think that, but she's in government!

Earth logic? Anyone?

Date: 2005-06-03 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maladaptive.livejournal.com
That's what's tripping me up.

Or maybe she's there to change it! Infiltrating the system for the good of womankind....

You know, I just watched Stepford Wives, and went "phew, life's not so bad!" and then saw this. >.>

Date: 2005-06-03 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
She seems to think that if men protected women adequately, then women wouldn't need to work or vote, but because men don't, women do. So, her solution is to take away the vote from women, while in no way requiring men to make sure to protect women's needs or rights. Brilliant.

Date: 2005-06-04 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phoenix-blue.livejournal.com
Kansas is the joke. Man, I thought Alabama was bad!

Date: 2005-06-05 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morganne13.livejournal.com
i agree with [livejournal.com profile] ciara_belle *brain go boom*...

Does this mean that her husband is really the one representing everybody in her area because she is merely a reflection of his beliefs and can't have her own?

Date: 2005-06-03 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
I'm fine with her holding that opinion, but I think she should both step down and stop voting.

Date: 2005-06-03 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azarias.livejournal.com
if it were being considered today she would vote against it.

HAHAHAHA.

Oh, those Republicans. Masters of satire!

Date: 2005-06-03 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciara-belle.livejournal.com
So she's a female elected official...who doesn't think women should vote or hold government office.

*brain go boom*

I mean, it's one thing to be a private citizen and think that, but she's in government!

Earth logic? Anyone?

Date: 2005-06-03 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maladaptive.livejournal.com
That's what's tripping me up.

Or maybe she's there to change it! Infiltrating the system for the good of womankind....

You know, I just watched Stepford Wives, and went "phew, life's not so bad!" and then saw this. >.>

Date: 2005-06-03 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
She seems to think that if men protected women adequately, then women wouldn't need to work or vote, but because men don't, women do. So, her solution is to take away the vote from women, while in no way requiring men to make sure to protect women's needs or rights. Brilliant.

Date: 2005-06-04 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phoenix-blue.livejournal.com
Kansas is the joke. Man, I thought Alabama was bad!

Date: 2005-06-05 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morganne13.livejournal.com
i agree with [livejournal.com profile] ciara_belle *brain go boom*...

Does this mean that her husband is really the one representing everybody in her area because she is merely a reflection of his beliefs and can't have her own?

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 12:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios