I have spent an eternity saying this.
Mar. 17th, 2005 09:49 pmTerri Schiavo is not on life support. She does not use a ventilator. I don't know where that story started, but here it ends. She is not hooked up to any machines. She uses a feeding tube. That is not life support. Taking her off the feeding tube will cause her to - slowly - starve or dehydrate.
There is evidence that she reacts to things around her. There is also evidence that her condition would be drastically improved if the money from the settlement had gone towards her treatment instead of her husband's court bills.
So please, base your opinions off of accurate information.
And now, I will let other people talk about being in situations where they were believed dead, and post those links (links I've posted before) about other people who nearly died because "after all, she's not going to recover, might as well pull the plug now" - and at the time, they were conscious.
There is evidence that she reacts to things around her. There is also evidence that her condition would be drastically improved if the money from the settlement had gone towards her treatment instead of her husband's court bills.
So please, base your opinions off of accurate information.
And now, I will let other people talk about being in situations where they were believed dead, and post those links (links I've posted before) about other people who nearly died because "after all, she's not going to recover, might as well pull the plug now" - and at the time, they were conscious.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 06:55 pm (UTC)Although...I think there may be a question of whether he did that legally or not (being married to two women at once) but I can't recall. That may have been thrown out.
Personally, if there is such a thing as "scum of the earth" I am inclinced to think that Mr. Schiavo is it.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 06:58 pm (UTC)Now, it may be that he believes he is doing the right thing. However, I don't think the evidence points in that direction.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 06:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 07:01 pm (UTC)I'm really torn on if she's there or not. It's always conflicting information on both sides (but I lean toward the fact that she's responsive). Supposedly, he became an in home nurse for her according to one timeline, but he never seemed to bring it up before, so I don't know. That's not what really bothers me about the debate.
What always horrifies me is that they're to starve her to death. Not even a humane end. Because euthanasia's wrong. Talk about the irony....
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-18 11:07 am (UTC)I am not pleased that this method is allowed to be used in any cases. I don't really want to argue this particular case, as I feel I know less about it than many who have taken positions. But I feel if we consider it acceptable to dehydrate someone to death, we should instead use a lethal injection or other more humane method. It takes days to die from dehydration... painful, painful days.
It's possible she won't feel it, of course. But if there's any chance that any part of her would...
no subject
Date: 2005-03-20 07:44 pm (UTC)I wholeheartedly agree. I think it's sad, and a bit sick, that we will give a convicted serial killer on death row a more comfortable death than an innocent woman will get.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 07:45 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 08:12 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 08:28 pm (UTC)And if she were a diabetic, and had to take a shot of insulin every day, would you say she was on life support?
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) BWAHAHAHA!
From:(frozen) YOU ARE IGNORANT.
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 09:22 pm (UTC)A feeding tube is a machine. Were she taken off of that machine, she would die. How, then, is this not life support? Can the phrase "life support" only be used in reference to a ventilator?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 09:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-18 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-18 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-20 10:04 am (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/users/kightp/465838.html?thread=2654894&style=mine#t2654894
Or, (which is pointed to in the above link):
http://respectfulofotters.blogspot.com/2005_03_01_respectfulofotters_archive.html#111120735448873570
no subject
Date: 2005-03-20 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-20 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 06:55 pm (UTC)Although...I think there may be a question of whether he did that legally or not (being married to two women at once) but I can't recall. That may have been thrown out.
Personally, if there is such a thing as "scum of the earth" I am inclinced to think that Mr. Schiavo is it.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 06:58 pm (UTC)Now, it may be that he believes he is doing the right thing. However, I don't think the evidence points in that direction.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 07:01 pm (UTC)I'm really torn on if she's there or not. It's always conflicting information on both sides (but I lean toward the fact that she's responsive). Supposedly, he became an in home nurse for her according to one timeline, but he never seemed to bring it up before, so I don't know. That's not what really bothers me about the debate.
What always horrifies me is that they're to starve her to death. Not even a humane end. Because euthanasia's wrong. Talk about the irony....
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 08:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 07:45 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 08:12 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 08:28 pm (UTC)And if she were a diabetic, and had to take a shot of insulin every day, would you say she was on life support?
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) BWAHAHAHA!
From:(frozen) YOU ARE IGNORANT.
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 09:22 pm (UTC)A feeding tube is a machine. Were she taken off of that machine, she would die. How, then, is this not life support? Can the phrase "life support" only be used in reference to a ventilator?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-17 09:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-18 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-20 10:04 am (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/users/kightp/465838.html?thread=2654894&style=mine#t2654894
Or, (which is pointed to in the above link):
http://respectfulofotters.blogspot.com/2005_03_01_respectfulofotters_archive.html#111120735448873570
no subject
Date: 2005-03-20 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-20 06:58 pm (UTC)