I had almost given up!
Oct. 3rd, 2004 03:14 amBut I think I've found a way to contact
atomic_pickle and explain my view to her (namely, that the deaths of the troops IS something we should care about).
Sure, comments to that comm are screened. Sure, she doesn't allow non-friend comments. But there's always LJ Connect!
conuly -> nrhk16 -> eternallynumb -> tsl_colourbars -> atomic_pickle (4 hops)
That's suprisingly short!
But two of the names probably aren't useful. Lemme try again....
conuly -> zoethe -> princessrini -> iamthedan -> sallysvision -> atomic_pickle (5 hops)
Okay. If
zoethe can be persuaded to post a link to this in her journal, and
princessrini does as well, and so do the other two people... Maybe
atomic_pickle will have the chance to see some non-positive feedback!
Well, it sure beats spamming the liberal/military comms of LJ with a link to my post, don't you think?
My only question: is this allowed under the ToS? It seems kinda iffy mihi.
conuly -> zoethe -> wolfka -> etched_scarss -> gigglyshy -> atomic_pickle (5 hops) also works.
Sure, comments to that comm are screened. Sure, she doesn't allow non-friend comments. But there's always LJ Connect!
conuly -> nrhk16 -> eternallynumb -> tsl_colourbars -> atomic_pickle (4 hops)
That's suprisingly short!
But two of the names probably aren't useful. Lemme try again....
conuly -> zoethe -> princessrini -> iamthedan -> sallysvision -> atomic_pickle (5 hops)
Okay. If
Well, it sure beats spamming the liberal/military comms of LJ with a link to my post, don't you think?
My only question: is this allowed under the ToS? It seems kinda iffy mihi.
conuly -> zoethe -> wolfka -> etched_scarss -> gigglyshy -> atomic_pickle (5 hops) also works.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 09:23 am (UTC)