Profile
conuly
Page Summary
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Active Entries
- 1: Okay, is there a searchable TV / movies corpus?
- 2: After we got to the end of Starfleet Academy we let the TV autoselect what's next
- 3: And my Robert Moses counter increments up yet again!
- 4: This is the yearly reminder
- 5: Finished Starfleet Academy
- 6: So here's this thread
- 7: I really need to wash my window
- 8: (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Dawn Flush for Compartmentalize by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 03:41 am (UTC)Which is too bad, although I maintain that pandas are too stupid to spend all the money it takes to breed them in captivity.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 04:02 am (UTC)I don't know about intelligence being the defining factor of whether or not we should care about an animal, but I do believe that they're not very well suited for their life. They're in fact walking proof of the theory of stupid design.
I mean, an animal whose diet is 99% bamboo but yet cannot digest bamboo and which still has the digestive system of a carnivore? Which, even in good times, had a severely restricted range? Which has a baby 1/880th of its size?
That's not exactly screaming "Evolutionary Success Story" to me. (Cockroaches, now....)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 07:05 pm (UTC)I don't think we shouldn't care about pandas, in fact, if we cared about them a little more we wouldn't have to spend the ridiculous amounts of money it takes to raise and breed them in captivity.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 03:41 am (UTC)Which is too bad, although I maintain that pandas are too stupid to spend all the money it takes to breed them in captivity.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 04:02 am (UTC)I don't know about intelligence being the defining factor of whether or not we should care about an animal, but I do believe that they're not very well suited for their life. They're in fact walking proof of the theory of stupid design.
I mean, an animal whose diet is 99% bamboo but yet cannot digest bamboo and which still has the digestive system of a carnivore? Which, even in good times, had a severely restricted range? Which has a baby 1/880th of its size?
That's not exactly screaming "Evolutionary Success Story" to me. (Cockroaches, now....)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 07:05 pm (UTC)I don't think we shouldn't care about pandas, in fact, if we cared about them a little more we wouldn't have to spend the ridiculous amounts of money it takes to raise and breed them in captivity.