Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: I also didn’t expect
- 2: Well, I dealt with my shock and horror by getting into a very stupid flamewar at /r/englishlearning
- 3: (no subject)
- 4: Does anybody have old magazines?
- 5: (no subject)
- 6: Two PSAs
- 7: Only 3 years and 3 weeks until the next Presidential Inauguration
- 8: Protest at Times Square at 2pm
- 9: Happy NYE!
Style Credit
- Style: Dawn Flush for Compartmentalize by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 07:13 pm (UTC)There was no Holocaust per se in the Pacific Theater, but what the Japanese government did before and during World War II, necessarily with the consent of its people, was evil.
Nagasaki and Hiroshima ended it. They ended the war, and they gave back life to the Japanese who would no longer have to waste their lives to a futile struggle against American and Soviet invasion. It's sad that so many people had to die the way they did -- those who didn't die instantly would have been in agony until their bodies failed. But what would have been worse, in my view, is a world without Japan, because that's exactly where we would be today.
Today's historical revisionists can sit back and argue from their armchairs that it was wrong to use the Bomb, that we should have whet the altar of war with millions of Japanese and American lives instead. I say they're full of horseshit: sometimes there are no right choices, and the choice that's least wrong is the one that, ultimately, kills the fewest. In war, those are frequently the only options you get.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 07:33 pm (UTC)You might talk about "revisionism", but when people alive then and presumably in the know about what was going on have commented that Japan was "ready to surrender" and had "already sued for peace" before the bombs were dropped... I don't understand how that makes any sense.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 07:13 pm (UTC)There was no Holocaust per se in the Pacific Theater, but what the Japanese government did before and during World War II, necessarily with the consent of its people, was evil.
Nagasaki and Hiroshima ended it. They ended the war, and they gave back life to the Japanese who would no longer have to waste their lives to a futile struggle against American and Soviet invasion. It's sad that so many people had to die the way they did -- those who didn't die instantly would have been in agony until their bodies failed. But what would have been worse, in my view, is a world without Japan, because that's exactly where we would be today.
Today's historical revisionists can sit back and argue from their armchairs that it was wrong to use the Bomb, that we should have whet the altar of war with millions of Japanese and American lives instead. I say they're full of horseshit: sometimes there are no right choices, and the choice that's least wrong is the one that, ultimately, kills the fewest. In war, those are frequently the only options you get.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 07:33 pm (UTC)You might talk about "revisionism", but when people alive then and presumably in the know about what was going on have commented that Japan was "ready to surrender" and had "already sued for peace" before the bombs were dropped... I don't understand how that makes any sense.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 12:07 pm (UTC)