I'm curious...
Oct. 13th, 2004 05:14 pmBecause I never understood this.
What's the big deal about national id card = evil? Why do people think that? How is it different from combining a state ID and a social security card? Don't many countries in Europe have a national ID (I don't know, actually...)?
What's the big deal about national id card = evil? Why do people think that? How is it different from combining a state ID and a social security card? Don't many countries in Europe have a national ID (I don't know, actually...)?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:18 pm (UTC)I don't get it either. :/
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:18 pm (UTC)[/bitter about bureaucracy]
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:25 pm (UTC)Rearrange those sentences into an order that makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:31 pm (UTC)The next step after a National ID is to combine everything with your ID. Your frequent-shopper card at Safeway. Your Blockbuster card. Your health insurance card.
So, then you get things like: "Oh, I'm sorry, Mrs. Bryant. I can't sell you a pizza because your health insurance has a flag here about cholesterol. Would you like the small side salad instead?"
Or, better still, getting pulled over for a routine traffic violation and, when they run your ID, getting put into cuffs while they search for methamphetamines because you happened to buy both brake fluid and Sudafed last week. Or because I bought a copy of "Soldier of Fortune" magazine.
How about having your college or university decide that the four weeks you went to visit your folks in another state mean you've lost residency and now must pay $15,000 in out-of-state tuition increases? They know about these four weeks, of course, because your national ID is used to board an airplane as well as to register for your classes (ostensibly because they want to make sure no for'ners with expired student visas can sign up for school).
This all, of course, ignores the fact that the IDs will almost certainly have an RFID in them, so their movement can even be tracked (and therefore, yours).
It's basically another way to monitor your activity, this time at a national level. Even people who prefer larger government get uneasy at the level of surveillance that's already available to ours.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:38 pm (UTC)I don't want to be in the government's databases. I am already, but that doesn't mean I have to give them more information, more of a hold on me.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:45 pm (UTC)*Grabs her wallet* I am currently carrying...
ID that proves I live in this flat/room
National Insurance Card
*Railcard for UK
*Rail Staff Travel Identity Card for UK (and the pass to go with it)
*Finnish bus pass (not my travelcard for general Helsinki travel, this is for further afield)
Helsinki studentcard (just a paper one - there is an additional card I would have were I here for longer)
*International Student Identity Card
*National Union of Students Card (technically out of date, but staying there until I get a new one in January)
*English University Enrolment Card (also out of date, kept for the same reason)
*English University Library Card (and again...)
Asterisked are photo-IDs.
None of them are proof of identity. Which is why I carry my passport (well, if I have whichever bag it happens to be in at the time with me.)
The one thing I wouldn't mind a national ID card for is ease of travel within the European Union. At the moment I just use my passport, but I'm a little envious of friends who can cross borders just with an ID card. Of course, since I would still require my passport to cross my own country's borders, it wouldn't make any difference.
I think my major objection to a mandatory national ID is that once they force everyone to have one, they can force everyone to show one.
And there's the issue of paying for the privilege too, but that's more specificly a UK issue.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:48 pm (UTC)I feel really uneasy about the tracking-people's-activities thing. I'm not involved in any criminal activity, but still, the thought of being spied on by the government... ugh.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 04:35 pm (UTC)Thanks for the advice anyway :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 06:25 pm (UTC)Warning: Comment in the language of "lamer" follows.
Date: 2004-10-13 06:38 pm (UTC)I just had to do that. XD
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 08:27 pm (UTC)national id card
Date: 2004-10-13 09:20 pm (UTC)the patriot act has provisons in it allowing for the subpoena of your "library and book shopping" records, which will be tracked through the proposed id card. among other things, i wanted to highlight this as it is alarming to me moreso than alot of other things.
basically, the id card would be made to allow for better tracking of us citizenry, not neccessarily for sinister purposes, but more to protect us from this terrorist threat, and to watch for terrorist behaviors. my problem with it is that absolute power corrupts absolutely, and coupled with absolute information about someone, hell, that is goddam scary. i donot trust that it wouldnt be put to sinister purposes in this day and age, especially not with everything that is going on right now.
conservatives and religious zealots get into power, and then they start rounding up "undesirables" based on the information on their national id card. for national security of course. for the security of our children and youth, and the health of our marriages.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 07:07 pm (UTC)