conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
I actually have *no* interest in Dahl's heirs authorizing changes to his children's books.

Which I guess mirrors the interest I had in reading Dahl with the kids when they were little. I read the hell out of his books when I was a kid, and we certainly read other books from my childhood, but I had exactly no desire to revisit any of his books with them. Not even in a "wow, just realized this is problematic" way, I just wasn't feeling it.

It *is* slightly amusing to watch people knot themselves up under the apparent assumption that this is something shockingly new. Yeah, no. Lots of books have endured edits over the years to update them and alter elements that somebody realized sounded really bad. Some of those edits work better than others. (Young Wizards, yes! Fudge series, not so much.)

I do have *one* thing to say, and it's not even on this subject. I'm not saying the sort of book this person decries doesn't exist, because of course it always has, since of course it's parents, teachers, and librarians who buy books and recommend them to others - but ffs, it's not that hard to find recently-published books featuring kids who largely are handling their own adventures. They're not even freaking hidden in a back catalog somewhere, as a commenter further down implied, they're getting Newberies and other awards.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 8th, 2026 03:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios