and it's making me have thoughts about that series again.
Lots of varied ones, most of which aren't worth delving into, but there is one question I'd like to see answered.
As we all know, Wizarding England is obsessed with two things: blood status* and Hogwarts House affiliation. I know, in school stories everything is a Big Deal and SO Important, but to carry over that attitude into adulthood, and late adulthood - well, that's something else.
Ever think that the muggleborns at Hogwarts get together and talk about the fact that wizards are super juvenile on this point? Like, they go to the mutual self-help society (because nobody else is helping them figure out the unwritten social rules of Wizards, such as they might be), pass around the popcorn, and start in on "Seriously, the gamekeeper was glaring at the first year Slytherins and declaring that they're all going to be evil. How would he even know that if it's true?" and "I heard two teachers arguing, and they kept calling each other house names. Geez, get over it, you're ancient!" or "My dormmate got a nasty letter from his parents because of where the Hat put him. That's crazy, right?"
* No, the good guys are manifestly not off the hook. The Weasleys have a cousin they don't even talk about because he's an accountant. Maybe if they talked to him, they'd find a way to manage their finances better. Maybe if all the wizards talked to accountants they wouldn't have to rely on Gringotts bank, and boy did I whoosh past that nasty little bit of stereotyping the first time around. Just didn't have the knowledge to grasp the context. Back to the Weasleys, that's there. That's right in the first book - "everybody knows we need muggleborn wizards or we'd die out, only bad sorts hate muggles, well, we do have a cousin we don't talk about because he's an accountant". It's there, and nobody ever calls Ron out on it! Not even the narration! It just sits there like a candy covered turd in a bag of M&Ms. Also, JKR, what's your deal with accountants? Is this an early sign of her well-documented phobia of math? (Maths.)
Lots of varied ones, most of which aren't worth delving into, but there is one question I'd like to see answered.
As we all know, Wizarding England is obsessed with two things: blood status* and Hogwarts House affiliation. I know, in school stories everything is a Big Deal and SO Important, but to carry over that attitude into adulthood, and late adulthood - well, that's something else.
Ever think that the muggleborns at Hogwarts get together and talk about the fact that wizards are super juvenile on this point? Like, they go to the mutual self-help society (because nobody else is helping them figure out the unwritten social rules of Wizards, such as they might be), pass around the popcorn, and start in on "Seriously, the gamekeeper was glaring at the first year Slytherins and declaring that they're all going to be evil. How would he even know that if it's true?" and "I heard two teachers arguing, and they kept calling each other house names. Geez, get over it, you're ancient!" or "My dormmate got a nasty letter from his parents because of where the Hat put him. That's crazy, right?"
* No, the good guys are manifestly not off the hook. The Weasleys have a cousin they don't even talk about because he's an accountant. Maybe if they talked to him, they'd find a way to manage their finances better. Maybe if all the wizards talked to accountants they wouldn't have to rely on Gringotts bank, and boy did I whoosh past that nasty little bit of stereotyping the first time around. Just didn't have the knowledge to grasp the context. Back to the Weasleys, that's there. That's right in the first book - "everybody knows we need muggleborn wizards or we'd die out, only bad sorts hate muggles, well, we do have a cousin we don't talk about because he's an accountant". It's there, and nobody ever calls Ron out on it! Not even the narration! It just sits there like a candy covered turd in a bag of M&Ms. Also, JKR, what's your deal with accountants? Is this an early sign of her well-documented phobia of math? (Maths.)
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 01:23 am (UTC)The Weasleys are in their own way as bad and any other pure bloods. Sure they say Muggles are alright, but they don't see them as people. Not just the Squib accountant cousin, but Mr. Weasley is totally fine with the campground owners being Oblivated every five minutes even though it clearly affects their cognition (GoF), and of course all the abuses he and the twins heap on the Dursleys. And when he praises Muggle ingenuity, Mr. Weasley sounds more like he's talking about a child that has surprised him with their cleverness than equals capable of thinking for themselves. The way Molly talks about Muggles the first time we see her on PLatform 9 3/4? Yikes.
The more JKR talks on Twitter, the more certain I am she thinks the Weasleys really do like and respect Muggles, not that she was intentionally painting a nuanced portrait of how prejudice manifests among the "woke".
I guess if there's only one high school in the country it takes on an outsized importance later in life than it would if everyone went to university and possibly moved somewhere else. Adult Wizarding Britain is just a continuation of Hogwarts because there is nothing else to influence the culture or pressure it to change.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 01:40 am (UTC)2. Oh, god, the campground owners. Okay, obviously the Wizengamot could not have predicted that some rogue Death Eaters were gonna stage a drunken afterparty of their own. But they certainly could have predicted that Wizards are shit at pretending to be Muggle! Instead of a bajillion obliviations - which no doubt got worse in quality as the wizards got more and more fatigued and bored with the job - why not one very carefully targeted bit of mind control before the World Cup - say, something convincing the campground owner that he really should take this all-expenses paid vacation he won and leave the campground in the hands of this helpful young couple that just showed up needing some temporary work and housing. (That couple could be played by some young first generation wizards, who presumably could act like convincing Muggles, or by squibs or other relatives of wizards.) The vacation to wherever would be a hell of a lot cheaper than paying people to keep wiping this family's memories! A little bit of planning could've saved a world of trouble. At the very least they could've convinced him he was hosting some sort of fan event or something that required funny costumes and bad fake accents. Then he wouldn't've been so weirded out by all the reservations and would have had a convenient answer for all this besides "magic". (Not that this is anybody's first response, but still.)
3. I think that "Hogwarts is the only wizarding school in Britain" is one of the things we just have to toss out. The only in-canon evidence for this is Hagrid saying it (Hagrid also says all dark wizards come from Slytherin, and he knows that's not true, he has deep personal awareness that it's not true), Ron vaguely saying that he knew other schools existed somewhere maybe, and Hermione stating there are three wizarding schools in England. But one school of 300 students, or even 1000-ish students, does not provide the wizarding world with enough of a population to support the complex infrastructure we know it has. No, I think we have to assume that this is somewhat hyperbolic, that Hogwarts is the best or most prestigious school in Britain, that the three schools in Europe are in fact simply the three oldest and most respected schools in Europe, that Hagrid and Ron are a bit dim, and that JKR threw up her hands at this tricky bit of worldbuilding and said "oh dear, maths". (I shouldn't snark, I think there's a good chance that her unwillingness to even attempt simple arithmetic is connected to an actual disability, but it's easy to snark sometimes.)
4. The writing in these books is a lot better if you assume JKR does in fact know how it looks and did that on purpose. I mean, I agree that she mostly doesn't and didn't, but still.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 01:43 am (UTC)But then, I've always had a soft spot for woobie, conflicted, marginally more self-aware than he seems Draco.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 07:38 am (UTC)Hahaha, next thing you'll be saying is that MIT dorms and Harvard houses don't matter. /anon because I don't want to admit to knowing this (and also still believing it!)
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 07:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 01:20 pm (UTC)MIT dorms have much larger cultural differences, because there's much more self-selection.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-03 07:23 am (UTC)It doesn't govern our whole life but if we lived in a small society where *everyone* went to Tech, it might.
Hogwarts gets the kids younger and longer, so it's even more formative.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 09:49 am (UTC)But I actually went to boarding school, and Hogwarts is *horrifying*! There isn't a set quiet time for doing homework, there's no apparent organisation for everyday things (maybe sheets are changed by magic, I suppose) and children are allowed to wander about without anybody in authority having a clue where they are, even though the environs are full of danger—a lake! a sinister forest! a tree that actually attacks people! It really wouldn't have taken a lot of thought to include some simple, logical daily routines, and would have made Hogwarts a more believable place.
I think, though, that JKR got the idea for the first HP book and just wrote it, grabbing for a convenient magical something wherever one was needed. It totally feels like a 'School' book, and reality isn't a necessary feature of those.
When she started getting into Bigger Stuff, though, she really needed to figure out how this world worked. It's a bit like the Star Trek universe, you can make it work if you want to, but don't let a smidgin of logic in if you want to work in that universe.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 11:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-02 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 03:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 03:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 02:50 pm (UTC)The "1/4 of the child population is destined to become evil" is, to me, one of the worst things about the series, even with fannish revisionism about Slytherins. The thing is, I can see it working in two ways. One is an overt acknowledgment of how fucked up Wizarding society is and a real commitment to change at the end (and at least some Slytherin characters who consciously fight against their stereotype). The other is a parallel to the theory that 20-30% of the population is fascist no matter what, and Wizarding England is trying to rein in and redirect that evil.
But she doesn't go there.
The Gringotts stuff is absolutely vile.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 03:31 pm (UTC)And yes, argh, Gringotts.
* That name alone ought to be justification for a child services call.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 03:41 pm (UTC)Then again, I also believe that the prejudice against not-Blood wizards persists even after school, because it's still present in school, so there would be motivation to rip out the current system of government and replace it with something better.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 05:12 pm (UTC)What's with letting their star pupil live with relatives who mistreat him that badly and cage him in a cupboard under the stairs for ten years? You'd think WCPS could come up with a spell to turn Vernon into something less of a shit.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 05:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 06:00 pm (UTC)Given how interlaced Rowling's wizarding world is with the ordinary world, the snobbish ignorance of wizards seems (in a Watsonian view) intentional.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 06:32 pm (UTC)King Arthur: The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. THAT is why I am your king.
Dennis: [interrupting] Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
Some tatty old headgear babbling is no basis for tagging a quarter of the wizarding population evil.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 08:01 pm (UTC)Seriously, the Slytherins are evil. That's a thing. But Hufflepuff? "You will never find a better friend in…?" That's it?!
Have you read/heard Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality? Several of these holes get spackeled up, even polished to look reasonable. I'm told it's the only alternate Potter series to get the official thumbs up from Rowling.
no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 08:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 09:23 pm (UTC)I wonder if I should direct you to this other person. They've been posting under lock, maybe I'll point them your way instead.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2019-12-01 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-03 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-12-03 01:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: