Re-reading Making Money today.
Feb. 7th, 2010 01:30 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"Trolls don't have a word for machismo in much the same way that puddles don't have a word for water."
Do you think that's a variant of the "Eskimos have 20 zillion words for snow" line? (BTW - they don't by any sensible view of the word (no more than we do, certainly), and it wouldn't matter if they did.)
Do you think that's a variant of the "Eskimos have 20 zillion words for snow" line? (BTW - they don't by any sensible view of the word (no more than we do, certainly), and it wouldn't matter if they did.)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 06:48 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Discworld%29
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 06:54 am (UTC)(Also, I just finished the audio book of Going Postal and am itching to revisit Making Money.)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 07:13 am (UTC)As if we English speakers don't get ohrwurmer just because we don't have a nice neat word for it.
Pratchett much more sensibly points out that a lack of a word doesn't necessarily mean a lack of a quality - just a lack of alternatives to that quality necessitating a label to differentiate it.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-07 10:49 am (UTC)IIRC, Pterry is talking about this line (or a similar line from Small Gods, not certain) and the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in The Folklore of Discworld - I think he's actually bringing up (and dismantling) the Eskimo line in that context. But I'd have to look it up to be sure, it's been a year since I read that. Or it might have been on tvTropes. *scratches head*