conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
It's the next best thing to ditching the Electoral College all together. So, you know, if you live in one of the states that hasn't signed up (most of them) you should definitely write to the people who could put that in action.

From now through December I'll be amusing myself with the little fantasy of Electors in swing states (those without laws against it) revolting and casting their votes for Clinton. I don't imagine it will actually happen - and certainly not in any sort of numbers that matter - but it does present a charming image. Imagine it! We could get rid of Trump and probably the Electoral College in one fell swoop and quite within the law!

Maybe we'll get very lucky and Trump will do something so shockingly awful between now and the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December that it actually will happen. I can't imagine what, given that nothing has been awful enough up until now, but I can dream.

(And I don't want anybody puncturing my pretty fantasy with grim reality! I know perfectly well I'll have to wake up to the dreary truth sooner or later, I don't need your help doing it!)

(I also don't need anybody pointing out that if this did happen, one half the electorate would be furious, and they're mostly the ones against gun control. I'm well aware of that fact as well, thank you.)

Date: 2016-11-10 07:11 am (UTC)
sathari: (Fairytails tell children dragons can be)
From: [personal profile] sathari
Here from my network page

*eyes wide* I wonder if there is any merit in a petition calling on any such electors to cast their vote with the popular vote? You know, in the name of actual democracy and the will of the people and all that jazz? Seriously, this is the happiest I've felt in about twenty-four hours. If there is a way to encourage this to happen, I am SO ON IT. (And especially given the Republican ambivalence about Trump to begin with.)

Date: 2016-11-10 08:18 am (UTC)
sathari: Forceghost!Anakin (Anakin's life is made of second chances)
From: [personal profile] sathari
Hah, yeah, I was frankly mostly just joining the chorus of happy fantasy. As I say, it's the first time I've relaxed in... now over twenty-four hours.

But! It so happens I was looking up the number of times that a US presidential candidate has won the popular vote but not the electoral vote. It's a total of five in the nation's history. The last time was of course Bush/Gore in 2000... and then the time before that was almost one hundred years previous, when Harrison beat Cleveland. (Granted that the time before that was even shorter, but, we have this hundred-year gap and then a pair of elections that go sideways in sixteen years, under vastly improved conditions for speed and accuracy of voting count on a purely technological level.) Especially in the context of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact--- we're basically asking the electors to be at the forefront of a push that already exists. (Looking at the map on the Wikipedia page, it looks like there's a noticeable overlap between "swing states" and "states that have the compact on their legislative radar". Hmmmm.)

(Also, the last two are under similar circumstances: a Democrat following in the footsteps of a two-term Democrat gets the popular vote but loses to the Republican. That is another whole layer of sideeye.)

But, yeah, I might just have to signal-boost this as well as writing my own letters. And, hell, this election has been full of "never really has before", let's go one more.

Also, would you mind if I linked this post and our discussion in a signal-boost, because between the two of us there's some good context here?

Date: 2016-11-11 01:32 am (UTC)
sathari: (Fairytails tell children dragons can be)
From: [personal profile] sathari
Linked away over at my journal, and, hah, no, no need to disillusion me, gently or otherwise! My beady little eyes just got gleaming at anything that could possibly be done even if it's just waving a flag in a hurricane--- it's better than not doing anything. It's better than acting like it's okay that we have twice now seen this THING where we have a successful two-term Democratic President and then the next Democratic candidate up WINS THE POPULAR VOTE but the fucking electoral college nullifies the voices of a majority of Americans--- whether it's because we live in a community where we're NOT the majority and our votes are cancelled out entirely, or because we move to the concentrated areas where we ARE the majority and then we have too few of those, despite their overall population density, to hold the electoral college. No, it's not okay. (Sorry. I know that I am probably preaching to the choir here in at least some of this. Just had to get that off my chest.)

And what's more, if we all keep talking, keep our voices going anywhere that we can, that keeps the pressure on. That keeps this whole mess from looking like it's OKAY. IT'S NOT OKAY.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5 6 78 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 1617
18 1920 21222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 05:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios