And its affiliates for breast cancer, the rainforest, child health, animal rescue, and literacy?
Do you know who helps support TheLiteracySite every time you click? That's right, Pigeonpresents.com, aka Mo Willems. This is because he rocks. And so does that pigeon.
(I needneedneed an icon.)
Do you know who helps support TheLiteracySite every time you click? That's right, Pigeonpresents.com, aka Mo Willems. This is because he rocks. And so does that pigeon.
(I needneedneed an icon.)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:53 pm (UTC)Here's the list of charities that TheAnimalRescueSite sends money to:
The Fund for Animals = HSUS affliate lobbying for animal rights (not animal welfare) org; not an actual helping-animals organization, just a PAC.
International Fund for Animal Welfare - another HSUS affliate; lots of reports of animals helped in exotic places, very little substance about the eventual disposition of animals 'helped'
North Shore Animal League - this one IS actually a shelter, but frankly, it's not a good one. For one thing, they won't take back animals that don't work out.
Petfinder.com Foundation - thsi is the only charity on the list that I can recommend, and frankly, for the time, effort, and spyware in the site's ads, it's just less effort to send them a direct donation for $10 or so a year.
To be fair, if you're a big HSUS fan (I'm not; see NC Pit Bull case, see deceptive fundraising practices from Katrina rescues and the Vick bust; see the whole 'we're the experts on animal shelters even though we don't run one with our multi-zillion dollar annual budget'...), the first two are probably okay. And if you consider any shelter a good one to donate to, NSAL is okay. After all, it doesn't cost you anything. But to my way of thinking, the first is doing more harm than good; the second has a real dearth of actual information about them; and the third is one I really wish would go away and I worry that I'm contributing to their media budget.
My BIGGEST objection to the ARS is the deceptive marketing. Your clicks don't put food in a bowl. They don't even pay the salary of some poor scmuck who is cleaning cages (or worse) at a shelter. They go to marketing and lobbying efforts of groups that are not, in all but one case, directly involved in animal sheltering.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:58 pm (UTC)I don't have a lot of money. I don't have energy or the ability to volunteer. What I do have is time and the internet. I knew that free clicks don't donate very much, but I had hoped I was doing a bit more good than that.
I think I'll look up the care2 set of click to gives and make sure to hit them today and maybe play some more freerice, even though freerice annoys me (for reasons totally unrelated to its charity, which I haven't researched).
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:22 pm (UTC)I like click-to-gives because they are at my level of what I have to offer, and they require no commitment. I don't do well with committing to do things, but I like something when I feel up to it I can do something really easy.
I have time, but I don't have time with things like energy. And phones are really problematic for me. And thinking uses up energy, so I ration it out.
I do appreciate the suggestion. I used to do a lot more than I do now. And maybe someday they'll figure out ways to make me healthier and I will again.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-18 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 08:03 pm (UTC)