Oh, hey. I should take this to
suggestions, but I want to make sure I'm right.
Feb. 6th, 2009 08:48 pmA few months ago I noticed something weird about screened comments and editing - namely, that if you have comments from non-friends screened, and they should edit their comment after it's unscreened, that it *stays* unscreened.
You can see how this could cause problems. (Or hilarity! Just have to have the right perspective on things!)
Anyway, I thought at the time "Oh, I should go tell
suggestions and, uh, suggest they fix this!", but then I got busy with other things and forgot.
Today I remembered, but I want to make sure that it really does do that before I bother anybody. So can somebody with a paid account please reply so I can make sure it does, in fact, do this? It doesn't strike me as a support issue, as nothing is *broken*. Of course, I haven't done support in a while, and I suppose it's possible that the definition of broken has changed since then.
Edit: It definitely does work. I'm letting the last commenter edit her post to confirm it's not a two-person fluke, because why ruin the fun?, but then I'm editing this post to unscreen everything :)
Edit: Screw it, editing now. I'm missing Monk, I'll have to rewatch it later.
You can see how this could cause problems. (Or hilarity! Just have to have the right perspective on things!)
Anyway, I thought at the time "Oh, I should go tell
Today I remembered, but I want to make sure that it really does do that before I bother anybody. So can somebody with a paid account please reply so I can make sure it does, in fact, do this? It doesn't strike me as a support issue, as nothing is *broken*. Of course, I haven't done support in a while, and I suppose it's possible that the definition of broken has changed since then.
Edit: It definitely does work. I'm letting the last commenter edit her post to confirm it's not a two-person fluke, because why ruin the fun?, but then I'm editing this post to unscreen everything :)
Edit: Screw it, editing now. I'm missing Monk, I'll have to rewatch it later.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:04 am (UTC)Edit: No. They are not.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:18 am (UTC)EDIT: Much better!
Edit again: It would appear that my comment remains unscreened. You are free to suggest!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:04 am (UTC)Edit: No. They are not.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:18 am (UTC)EDIT: Much better!
Edit again: It would appear that my comment remains unscreened. You are free to suggest!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-07 02:21 am (UTC)