They're not dogs. That's why we generally don't make shock collars for children.
On the same subject (but not nearly as severe), your typical three or four year old child doesn't need to get high-fives and GOOD EATING!!!!!! for munching on some glorified potato chips. Either they're hungry, and they eat, or they're not hungry, so they don't. (Or they're hungry and they don't eat, which sucks, but assuming you haven't made something you know they can't/won't eat, that's probably a temporary situation.)
Praising a kid for eating. Eating snacks, of all things. Now I've seen everything.
On the same subject (but not nearly as severe), your typical three or four year old child doesn't need to get high-fives and GOOD EATING!!!!!! for munching on some glorified potato chips. Either they're hungry, and they eat, or they're not hungry, so they don't. (Or they're hungry and they don't eat, which sucks, but assuming you haven't made something you know they can't/won't eat, that's probably a temporary situation.)
Praising a kid for eating. Eating snacks, of all things. Now I've seen everything.
Judge rotenberg Centre and kids being praised for eating
Date: 2006-03-22 03:45 am (UTC)Can I presume the three/four year old was probably not typical? Perhaps she had psychosocial dwarfism for instance?
Adelaide
Re: Judge rotenberg Centre and kids being praised for eating
Date: 2006-03-22 03:47 am (UTC)Can I presume the three/four year old was probably not typical?
There were two of them. And they seemed normal (not that that always means much). Other than the obsessiveness with which their adults kept praising them, that is. But other than that, the adults treated them... normally.
Honestly, this sort of insane praising of kids happens all the time, and it everlastingly pisses me off. Children. Aren't. Dogs.
Re: Judge rotenberg Centre and kids being praised for eating
Date: 2006-03-22 03:58 am (UTC)I don't really like the praising either. I wouldn't even praise a dog too much if I had it.
Now encouragement is good and true.
Children do learn a lot from the way adults treat them, don't they?
Maybe the adults want to show how much they value their children ... more like in public or something.
But eating is natural.
Adelaide
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 03:46 am (UTC)I have a problem with this particular choice of shocking children because it's bad medicine and bad parenting and bad teaching. It's not very effective at getting good results (whereby good I mean actual education going on) and it's just laziness. Positive reinforcement has been show to work much better than punishment. Set up a token economy if you must, but don't go around physically hurting kids. We've shown that that doesn't work well and can be rather harmful.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 03:50 am (UTC)Well hey, it's never too early to teach them anti-anorexia!
Cause there are plenty of people out there that we're happy if they eat *anything*...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 07:04 am (UTC)Inhumane shocking
Date: 2006-03-22 07:32 am (UTC)But the second one is more inhumane.
The child didn't ask for this. Nor did the dog. This is on innocent people who did nothing wrong, who are acting out the dictates of their nature.
And a depressed person is usually acting out of learnt behaviour patterns, in most cases, even if it does become chemical in the end.
I think I see a distinction between nature and (lack of or dysfunctional) nurture.
Adelaide
who though she has had depression in the past would describe hers as more situational (gets worse under STRESS) than chemical
Re: Inhumane shocking
Date: 2006-03-22 07:40 am (UTC)Re: Inhumane shocking
Date: 2006-03-22 07:49 am (UTC)So the brain does run on electricity.
It's like food, isn't it? You're only giving it some of what's natural. But you can over shock, like over-vitamin or over-mineral.
Adelaide
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 07:31 am (UTC)But then, you know Seth isn't (wasn't? he eats fine now...) normal when this was going on. :-\
Being objective
Date: 2006-03-22 07:32 am (UTC)Adelaide
Judge rotenberg Centre and kids being praised for eating
Date: 2006-03-22 03:45 am (UTC)Can I presume the three/four year old was probably not typical? Perhaps she had psychosocial dwarfism for instance?
Adelaide
Re: Judge rotenberg Centre and kids being praised for eating
Date: 2006-03-22 03:47 am (UTC)Can I presume the three/four year old was probably not typical?
There were two of them. And they seemed normal (not that that always means much). Other than the obsessiveness with which their adults kept praising them, that is. But other than that, the adults treated them... normally.
Honestly, this sort of insane praising of kids happens all the time, and it everlastingly pisses me off. Children. Aren't. Dogs.
Re: Judge rotenberg Centre and kids being praised for eating
Date: 2006-03-22 03:58 am (UTC)I don't really like the praising either. I wouldn't even praise a dog too much if I had it.
Now encouragement is good and true.
Children do learn a lot from the way adults treat them, don't they?
Maybe the adults want to show how much they value their children ... more like in public or something.
But eating is natural.
Adelaide
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 03:46 am (UTC)I have a problem with this particular choice of shocking children because it's bad medicine and bad parenting and bad teaching. It's not very effective at getting good results (whereby good I mean actual education going on) and it's just laziness. Positive reinforcement has been show to work much better than punishment. Set up a token economy if you must, but don't go around physically hurting kids. We've shown that that doesn't work well and can be rather harmful.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 03:50 am (UTC)Well hey, it's never too early to teach them anti-anorexia!
Cause there are plenty of people out there that we're happy if they eat *anything*...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 07:04 am (UTC)Inhumane shocking
Date: 2006-03-22 07:32 am (UTC)But the second one is more inhumane.
The child didn't ask for this. Nor did the dog. This is on innocent people who did nothing wrong, who are acting out the dictates of their nature.
And a depressed person is usually acting out of learnt behaviour patterns, in most cases, even if it does become chemical in the end.
I think I see a distinction between nature and (lack of or dysfunctional) nurture.
Adelaide
who though she has had depression in the past would describe hers as more situational (gets worse under STRESS) than chemical
Re: Inhumane shocking
Date: 2006-03-22 07:40 am (UTC)Re: Inhumane shocking
Date: 2006-03-22 07:49 am (UTC)So the brain does run on electricity.
It's like food, isn't it? You're only giving it some of what's natural. But you can over shock, like over-vitamin or over-mineral.
Adelaide
no subject
Date: 2006-03-22 07:31 am (UTC)But then, you know Seth isn't (wasn't? he eats fine now...) normal when this was going on. :-\
Being objective
Date: 2006-03-22 07:32 am (UTC)Adelaide