![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Honestly, Monk is always right, but he does everything backwards. If a real police department solved cases by finding the guilty party first and then proving it, we'd say they were railroading people - and rightfully so!
And despite what Monk thinks, pointing with two fingers is not a trait exclusive to murderers. THAT'S his big evidence? Now he's gonna prove that the guy's the killer, and he is, but Monk is still wrong.
Also? ( Read more... )
Edit: "You don't like the way I phrased an answer? What kind of evidence is that?"
A very good question indeed. I can think of many reasons somebody ( Read more... )
And despite what Monk thinks, pointing with two fingers is not a trait exclusive to murderers. THAT'S his big evidence? Now he's gonna prove that the guy's the killer, and he is, but Monk is still wrong.
Also? ( Read more... )
Edit: "You don't like the way I phrased an answer? What kind of evidence is that?"
A very good question indeed. I can think of many reasons somebody ( Read more... )
