On anti-HP-hype

[conuly]

A lot of people on my friends list today have posted about how they don't want the new HP book when it comes out. Harry Potter is derivative, a rip-off. It's badly written. It's in serious need of a good editing job. It's overhyped!

Well, yeah. I know!

I have always liked literary fluff. I still have very fond memories of the Baby-Sitters Club books, and of the Sweet Valley Twins series. I will happily read cheesy sci-fi novels with plot holes big enough to drive trucks though. (I also watch Lifetime and Disney made-for-tv movies, which really should give an indication of my taste). Yes, I read and enjoy serious works as well, but I've always felt there was a little bit of fun in reading candy. Or mocking it, whatever.

Am I the only one who sees it that way? Don't take Harry Potter so seriously. Read it, laugh, and move on with your life. Or don't read it. But don't diss those of us who happen to like badly-written books and movies.

Comments

[furiosity.livejournal.com]

Actually, I agree that the books need not be as long as they are. But that, I think, is a matter of personal preference -- some people can read the Fountainhead and think it's brilliant, I think it's boring and uninspired. And I love the descriptions in the LotR series, I don't think it would be anywhere without them. Bottom line is -- JKR isn't everyone's cup of tea, and that's fine, far be it from me to try to convince people to like something that they can't enjoy. However, it's kind of like debating the merits of mash over French fries.

[conuly]

*grins*

Good answer.