And Peterson was sentenced to death...

[conuly]

Why? Because the evidence was so compelling?

No.

He didn't show enough emotion during the trial.

(Thanks, rpeate)

Okay, youse guys can now talk about how horrible it is, because I'm too cold to do so.

Comments

[conuly]

We don't know that he was guilty. There really wasn't enough evidence to even merit a conviction. As for not showing emotion, that doesn't mean anything. Lots of people have trouble showing socially acceptable emotions, yet they still feel things.

[auryanne.livejournal.com]

Obviously, twelve people who were selected by both sides found differently. You know something they don't?

[conuly]

Yes. I know everything. I see you when you're sleeping, I know when you're awake. I am... SANTA!!!!

And I'm not getting into a fight with you. Please, calm down.

[auryanne.livejournal.com]

Obviously you're very misinformed about this case.

It's hard not to be annoyed when this is about the 8 billionth knee-jerk post I've seen about it. "OMG there was no evidence!!!!!"

[conuly]

But I didn't say that in my post. All I said was that it sounded as though the verdict was unfair. That, of course, applies only if you believe the news reports at CNN.

[staircase-wit.livejournal.com]

Obviously, twelve people who were selected by both sides found differently. You know something they don't?

Yes, my strawmanly co-poster. I do know something they don't.

I know that lack of affect is not a crime, nor is lack of emotion for that matter. Murder is a crime. Not displaying emotion in the proper mannor is not a crime. However, with the level of hystrionics I'm noting from you, (especially witht he Big Big Big Big post), it's not something you really have worry about.