![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
conuly
A Short Track Record On P&G's Promotion of Homosexuality
Whee! *gets out the popcorn*
Was the largest financial supporter of a law to give special rights to homosexuals in Cincinnati, but absolutely refused to support the Ohio Marriage Protection Amendment defining marriage as being only between one man and one woman.
Well, see, that would be what we in the business like to call hypocritical. This is the first time we see the phrase "special" rights in place of equal rights.
P&G even went so far as to tell the citizens of Cincinnati that they were “out of step” if they didn’t support special rights for homosexuals, and it was not “right” (thus it was wrong) not to do so.
http://www.pgboycott.com/pginformation.pdf
http://www.pgboycott.com/pgcontributions.pdf
Gotta admire people who stand up for their convictions.
Using that reasoning, P&G thinks that the millions who voted overwhelmingly to ban homosexual marriage in 13 states were "out of step" and did not do what is "right," (thus it was wrong for them not to support homosexual marriage).
Yes, we got that. I understand that you're writing for a specific audience, but don't you think it's insulting to say that even you think they're incapable of understanding basic logic?
Forces employees to attend a diversity training program promoting the acceptance of homosexuality, regardless of their moral or religious views.
Now, that could be a problem. Take it up with the courts.
One P&G employee wrote: "I had to go to the captive audience Diversity class. The movie on homosexuals was very offensive to Christians. It showed a man in a collar saying 'there is nothing in the Bible which says that homosexuality is wrong.'"
WRONG. Well, no. I agree that this movie could be seen as offensive to some Christians (though I disagree with your apparent interpretation of the Bible), however...
Not all Christians agree with you.
So, it's really only offensive to those Christians who do. Which isn't all Christians.
Procter & Gamble is the leading sponsor of two TV programs that continually push the homosexual agenda.
TV programs which, we'll find, have a huge audience.
The sitcom Will & Grace regularly promotes homosexuality and explicit sex-talk with jokes about male and female genitalia, masturbation, oral sex and even anal sex. Will & Grace is the program that showed two men passionately kissing each other.
OMG! I've watched that show! I've become... a gay man!!!!!111
According to Broadcasting & Cable online magazine, P&G was the top sponsor of Will & Grace between September 2003 and February 2004. P&G spent an astonishing $8.2 million in sponsorship of this program promoting the homosexual agenda.
And I'm sure it was profitable for them to promote said agenda, which seems to involve equal rights and stupid jokes.
Queer Eye for the Straight Guy depicts five homosexual men remaking the "cluttered, straight men of the world" so that they look, dress and act in the manner of the "cool" and, by implication, superior "gay" community.
They're not exactly acting gay... well, not everywhere...
The program consistently seeks to validate and glorify the homosexual lifestyle.
Better than being inconsistent, eh?
Between September 2003 and February 2004, P&G spent $2,000,000 in sponsorship of this program promoting the homosexual agenda.
Which in this case would seem to be "conforming to idiotic stereotypes and making a mockery of oneself". Gotcha. (I'm not a fan of the Queer Eye)
Procter & Gamble actively seeks out individuals who practice the abnormal and destructive homosexual lifestyle to come to work for the company.
Well, I'll agree that being gay is not normal, but abnormal has unfortunate perjorative connotations. And destructive? What, gay people blow up buildings now? And spew hatred on websites? And routinely go "straightbashing"?
Its company logo and corporate contact information appears on the top homosexual job recruiting site in America. See the ad at http://www.pgboycott.com/pggayworkprofile.pdf
I'm not opening the PDF file, but I'm wondering what the problem here is. Gay people shouldn't earn money, and therefore should be a drain on the welfare system?
Procter & Gamble created and ran an ad that showed two men (in fuzzy focus at top center of the ad) in bed after an apparent sexual encounter.
Oh, this is going to be funny, just watch....
The ad leaves the impression that homosexual sex is normal, thrilling and exciting, and was run in a homosexual publication called Xtra. See the ad at http://www.pgboycott.com/pgcommercialcloset.pdf
OMG! They ran an ad that featured two gay men... IN A GAY MAGAZINE! How dare they! I *will* check out that ad later and say whether I think it makes gay sex seem normal, thrilling, or exciting. I suspect that for the audience, it's at least normal.
Edit: Okay, I have to say, seeing the ad, it's the first time I ever saw an ad for laundry products look sexy. But I, unlike the AFA people (ever notice that that site only has pictures of blond kids?) don't see a problem with this.
P&G wrote to their Cincinnati employees urging them to support the repeal of a city law that forbids giving special rights to homosexuals.
Special. Equal. Special. Equal. Hm....
P&G gave $40,000 to help promote special rights for homosexuals in their successful attempt. The co-leader of the campaign was a P&G corporate executive.
$40,000 isn't that much (note the use of the word special again).
P&G regularly supports pro-homosexual media with advertising.
Yes, we can see that. We're not blind. Or if we are, we're at least not metaphorically blind.
According to the pro-homosexual Internet news site 365Gay.com, "Procter & Gamble has been a long time supporter of the gay community. It has one of the strongest workplace equality policies among American companies and is a frequent advertiser in the LGBT media, including 365Gay.com"
So... it treats all its employees equally and does not discriminate? The fiend.
At the request of homosexual activist groups, P&G dropped advertising support for television talk show host, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, because of her politically incorrect view that homosexuality is wrong. http://davidsisler.com/06-10-2000.htm
Yes, this would be consistent. Dr. Laura also happens to be an offensive joke. Supporting her wasn't exactly earning them any money.
Procter & Gamble is a major corporate sponsor of the annual Cincinnati Pride (homosexual) event celebrating homosexuality. http://www.cincypride.com
I'm starting to actually like this company.
P&G supports an employee network group called GABLE (Gay and Bi-Sexual, Lesbian Employees of Procter & Gamble).
Whee!
P&G's benefits program includes domestic partnership benefits for same-sex partners. Andrea Adkins of Dayton, a P&G employee for over 20 years, said that the company’s decision to offer domestic partner benefits will be a "very influential for other large typically conservative companies. People do look to Procter & Gamble as an example," Adkins said.
Yes, this would be consistent with their non-discrimination policy. It's their money, they can spend it however they wish.
P&G sponsors the annual “Out & Equal Workplace Advocates” workplace summits. Out and Equal is a homosexual advocacy organization promoting homosexuality in major companies. http://www.outandequal.org/pdf/2003-06.pdf
I'm really impressed.
P&G was named by PlanetOut as a top 20 company to work for based on their pro-homosexual support and benefits. http://www.planetout.com/pno/money/article.html?sernum=308
Yes, we heard about those horrible, terrible benefits.
WARNING: This site contains photos that depict homosexual physical contact.
*snickers* I have to check that link out too. Whaddaya wanna bet it's nothing more than kissing?
Edit: I'm not seeing *any* pictures, certainly not at the related links. You'd have to be *looking* to see them. Denial, anyone?
In 2004, the Human Rights Campaign gave P&G a score of 86 percent in a Corporate Equality Index (CEI). The CEI rates large American businesses on how they are treating gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees, consumers and investors.
Those pesky human rights. How evil.
Well, that was fun! Hold on, I'll click a few links and get back to youse.
Whee! *gets out the popcorn*
Was the largest financial supporter of a law to give special rights to homosexuals in Cincinnati, but absolutely refused to support the Ohio Marriage Protection Amendment defining marriage as being only between one man and one woman.
Well, see, that would be what we in the business like to call hypocritical. This is the first time we see the phrase "special" rights in place of equal rights.
P&G even went so far as to tell the citizens of Cincinnati that they were “out of step” if they didn’t support special rights for homosexuals, and it was not “right” (thus it was wrong) not to do so.
http://www.pgboycott.com/pginformation.pdf
http://www.pgboycott.com/pgcontributions.pdf
Gotta admire people who stand up for their convictions.
Using that reasoning, P&G thinks that the millions who voted overwhelmingly to ban homosexual marriage in 13 states were "out of step" and did not do what is "right," (thus it was wrong for them not to support homosexual marriage).
Yes, we got that. I understand that you're writing for a specific audience, but don't you think it's insulting to say that even you think they're incapable of understanding basic logic?
Forces employees to attend a diversity training program promoting the acceptance of homosexuality, regardless of their moral or religious views.
Now, that could be a problem. Take it up with the courts.
One P&G employee wrote: "I had to go to the captive audience Diversity class. The movie on homosexuals was very offensive to Christians. It showed a man in a collar saying 'there is nothing in the Bible which says that homosexuality is wrong.'"
WRONG. Well, no. I agree that this movie could be seen as offensive to some Christians (though I disagree with your apparent interpretation of the Bible), however...
Not all Christians agree with you.
So, it's really only offensive to those Christians who do. Which isn't all Christians.
Procter & Gamble is the leading sponsor of two TV programs that continually push the homosexual agenda.
TV programs which, we'll find, have a huge audience.
The sitcom Will & Grace regularly promotes homosexuality and explicit sex-talk with jokes about male and female genitalia, masturbation, oral sex and even anal sex. Will & Grace is the program that showed two men passionately kissing each other.
OMG! I've watched that show! I've become... a gay man!!!!!111
According to Broadcasting & Cable online magazine, P&G was the top sponsor of Will & Grace between September 2003 and February 2004. P&G spent an astonishing $8.2 million in sponsorship of this program promoting the homosexual agenda.
And I'm sure it was profitable for them to promote said agenda, which seems to involve equal rights and stupid jokes.
Queer Eye for the Straight Guy depicts five homosexual men remaking the "cluttered, straight men of the world" so that they look, dress and act in the manner of the "cool" and, by implication, superior "gay" community.
They're not exactly acting gay... well, not everywhere...
The program consistently seeks to validate and glorify the homosexual lifestyle.
Better than being inconsistent, eh?
Between September 2003 and February 2004, P&G spent $2,000,000 in sponsorship of this program promoting the homosexual agenda.
Which in this case would seem to be "conforming to idiotic stereotypes and making a mockery of oneself". Gotcha. (I'm not a fan of the Queer Eye)
Procter & Gamble actively seeks out individuals who practice the abnormal and destructive homosexual lifestyle to come to work for the company.
Well, I'll agree that being gay is not normal, but abnormal has unfortunate perjorative connotations. And destructive? What, gay people blow up buildings now? And spew hatred on websites? And routinely go "straightbashing"?
Its company logo and corporate contact information appears on the top homosexual job recruiting site in America. See the ad at http://www.pgboycott.com/pggayworkprofile.pdf
I'm not opening the PDF file, but I'm wondering what the problem here is. Gay people shouldn't earn money, and therefore should be a drain on the welfare system?
Procter & Gamble created and ran an ad that showed two men (in fuzzy focus at top center of the ad) in bed after an apparent sexual encounter.
Oh, this is going to be funny, just watch....
The ad leaves the impression that homosexual sex is normal, thrilling and exciting, and was run in a homosexual publication called Xtra. See the ad at http://www.pgboycott.com/pgcommercialcloset.pdf
OMG! They ran an ad that featured two gay men... IN A GAY MAGAZINE! How dare they! I *will* check out that ad later and say whether I think it makes gay sex seem normal, thrilling, or exciting. I suspect that for the audience, it's at least normal.
Edit: Okay, I have to say, seeing the ad, it's the first time I ever saw an ad for laundry products look sexy. But I, unlike the AFA people (ever notice that that site only has pictures of blond kids?) don't see a problem with this.
P&G wrote to their Cincinnati employees urging them to support the repeal of a city law that forbids giving special rights to homosexuals.
Special. Equal. Special. Equal. Hm....
P&G gave $40,000 to help promote special rights for homosexuals in their successful attempt. The co-leader of the campaign was a P&G corporate executive.
$40,000 isn't that much (note the use of the word special again).
P&G regularly supports pro-homosexual media with advertising.
Yes, we can see that. We're not blind. Or if we are, we're at least not metaphorically blind.
According to the pro-homosexual Internet news site 365Gay.com, "Procter & Gamble has been a long time supporter of the gay community. It has one of the strongest workplace equality policies among American companies and is a frequent advertiser in the LGBT media, including 365Gay.com"
So... it treats all its employees equally and does not discriminate? The fiend.
At the request of homosexual activist groups, P&G dropped advertising support for television talk show host, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, because of her politically incorrect view that homosexuality is wrong. http://davidsisler.com/06-10-2000.htm
Yes, this would be consistent. Dr. Laura also happens to be an offensive joke. Supporting her wasn't exactly earning them any money.
Procter & Gamble is a major corporate sponsor of the annual Cincinnati Pride (homosexual) event celebrating homosexuality. http://www.cincypride.com
I'm starting to actually like this company.
P&G supports an employee network group called GABLE (Gay and Bi-Sexual, Lesbian Employees of Procter & Gamble).
Whee!
P&G's benefits program includes domestic partnership benefits for same-sex partners. Andrea Adkins of Dayton, a P&G employee for over 20 years, said that the company’s decision to offer domestic partner benefits will be a "very influential for other large typically conservative companies. People do look to Procter & Gamble as an example," Adkins said.
Yes, this would be consistent with their non-discrimination policy. It's their money, they can spend it however they wish.
P&G sponsors the annual “Out & Equal Workplace Advocates” workplace summits. Out and Equal is a homosexual advocacy organization promoting homosexuality in major companies. http://www.outandequal.org/pdf/2003-06.pdf
I'm really impressed.
P&G was named by PlanetOut as a top 20 company to work for based on their pro-homosexual support and benefits. http://www.planetout.com/pno/money/article.html?sernum=308
Yes, we heard about those horrible, terrible benefits.
WARNING: This site contains photos that depict homosexual physical contact.
*snickers* I have to check that link out too. Whaddaya wanna bet it's nothing more than kissing?
Edit: I'm not seeing *any* pictures, certainly not at the related links. You'd have to be *looking* to see them. Denial, anyone?
In 2004, the Human Rights Campaign gave P&G a score of 86 percent in a Corporate Equality Index (CEI). The CEI rates large American businesses on how they are treating gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees, consumers and investors.
Those pesky human rights. How evil.
Well, that was fun! Hold on, I'll click a few links and get back to youse.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 06:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:21 pm (UTC)'K, so these fine people (and I use that word loosely) have established that they don't know the difference between special and equal - but really, the law that's in place there at the moment needs to go. It basically keeps homophobic hate crimes/discrimination/whathaveyou legal.
Pity I'm from the wrong county to have done anything about it in November.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:39 pm (UTC)I didn't think so either.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 12:35 pm (UTC)Yeah, P&G is very tolerant and cool, except for the whole animal testing thing. I researched them for some school thing a year ago, and was really impressed by their policies. And that ad actually makes laundry look kind of fun. :D
no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 06:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:21 pm (UTC)'K, so these fine people (and I use that word loosely) have established that they don't know the difference between special and equal - but really, the law that's in place there at the moment needs to go. It basically keeps homophobic hate crimes/discrimination/whathaveyou legal.
Pity I'm from the wrong county to have done anything about it in November.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:39 pm (UTC)I didn't think so either.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-12 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-13 12:35 pm (UTC)Yeah, P&G is very tolerant and cool, except for the whole animal testing thing. I researched them for some school thing a year ago, and was really impressed by their policies. And that ad actually makes laundry look kind of fun. :D