The amount of misinformation contained here is scary.
It is perfectly natural to not masturbate. Some people just don't. And, of course, it's perfectly natural to masturbate, and to want to - it will not make you go blind, grow hair, or get pimples. I'm a bit wary of searching for a link to prove that a lack of masturbation isn't connected to a frequency of wet dreams (don't want to find nothing but porn!) but I'm 93% confident that I am correct in that statement.
Nobody *has* to masturbate. You won't die if you don't. It's just that most people prefer to than to not.
It is perfectly natural to not masturbate. Some people just don't. And, of course, it's perfectly natural to masturbate, and to want to - it will not make you go blind, grow hair, or get pimples. I'm a bit wary of searching for a link to prove that a lack of masturbation isn't connected to a frequency of wet dreams (don't want to find nothing but porn!) but I'm 93% confident that I am correct in that statement.
Nobody *has* to masturbate. You won't die if you don't. It's just that most people prefer to than to not.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 11:42 am (UTC)I can't speak for girls - I'm not one, and very few websites even mention that girls have wetdreams. I do wish that you girls would stop trying to speak of something you know nothing about.
The "build up" theory? Maybe it's clinically incorrect - but it sure *feels* true. You can feel it building up over time, you can feel it released afterwards. And there's significantly more sperm after a week than after a day.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 11:48 am (UTC)But I *do* know something about this. I educate myself. I read medical information. I don't just make stuff up.
The "build up" theory? Maybe it's clinically incorrect - but it sure *feels* true.
But it's not true. And it's wrong to act like it is just because it "feels" true. It feels true and obvious that the sun is what moves around the earth, but it's not true and there's no need to spread that misinformation.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 12:19 pm (UTC)Thus accounting for the "build up" feeling, which would then have nothing to do with sperm or ejaculate either one.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 01:54 pm (UTC)That was what I seem to recall, but I can't find the book I got it from to refresh my memory. (And you know as well as I do that Googling anything about penile nerves, orgasms and ejaculation is going to net you roughly seventeen thousand results, assaying out at fifty percent pr0n sites and forty-five percent Viagra ads, with a small but obtrusive percentage of "herbal enhancement product" listings.)
no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 06:43 pm (UTC)Just because we don't experience ejaculation doesn't mean we know "nothing" about it. As Conuly said, some of us actually read about it, whether official studies or simply personal accounts. And some of us have been in relationships for good lengths of time--I think that sleeping with a guy for years allows me some insight into how it all works.
As I understand it, based on a scientific study I read (and my own experience), it's true for some men that when they deny themselves for a long period of time and then give in, the ejaculate tends to be greater in volume. However, that is not due to a buildup of material, as Conuly has said; it's true for women, too, that we'll often spasm harder after prolonged periods of abstinence. And when abstaining, sexual dreams (feminine wet dreams) are more common, too.
So now, perhaps, you can speak for girls, at least in a general way. Such is the wonder of communication and research.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-05 11:04 pm (UTC)