conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
Notable quote found in my sociolinguistics packet. This is a quote that sociolinguists would tend to disagree with.

You could have fooled me. I thought it was correct to write 'we were' and incorrect to write 'we was'. I did not realise it was just a question dialect: I thought it was a question of grammar or, if you do not like that word, of logic. You cannot use the singular form of the verb with a plural pronoun.

(emphasis totally mine)

Logic? Logic? How can he think of talking about logic in a system where the singular second person plural is supposed to take, oh yes, a plural form of the verb? I was, you were, he/she/it was, we/you/they were. That's logic? Or does he say "you was"? If so, I'm impressed. Most people taking his stance wouldn't.

Head-hurty....

Date: 2004-11-02 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wakasplat.livejournal.com
Plus y'all isn't always plural.

Date: 2004-11-02 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wakasplat.livejournal.com
There's a short discussion of it here:

http://home.bluemarble.net/~langmin/miniatures/yall.htm

Basically, there are times when it can look singular (but isn't really, but is spoken to one person referring to several absent people), but I've also definitely been y'alled in the singular. That's said to be a myth, but given that it's been said to me by people who weren't just joking, I think it's more like rare.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 1213 14
15 16 17 1819 20 21
22 23 24 252627 28

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 1st, 2026 12:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios