From the Times...
Nov. 1st, 2004 12:34 amWhen you step into the voting booth on Tuesday, you have a unique opportunity to personally help shape our national policy and the direction of this country. Please try to never make the mistake of voting a straight party ticket regardless of who is running under party banners.
The powers that be of both major parties are turning up the pressure for you not to think for yourself and blindly follow their urging and vote straight Democratic or Republican. Don't fall for it!
There are candidates of both parties who do not deserve to be elected. Know whom you vote for, regardless of which party they belong to.
The old adage "Bad leaders are elected by good people who don't vote" is timeless and holds true today.
*blinks*
Does anybody know anything about the non-Presidential candidates where they are? Is that presidential with a small p?
The powers that be of both major parties are turning up the pressure for you not to think for yourself and blindly follow their urging and vote straight Democratic or Republican. Don't fall for it!
There are candidates of both parties who do not deserve to be elected. Know whom you vote for, regardless of which party they belong to.
The old adage "Bad leaders are elected by good people who don't vote" is timeless and holds true today.
*blinks*
Does anybody know anything about the non-Presidential candidates where they are? Is that presidential with a small p?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:48 pm (UTC)Even though I try to vote for who I like, and not staight Democratic, I still end up voting for mostly the Dems.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:52 pm (UTC)I'm not voting for him.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:55 pm (UTC)Yay!
I knew about my local candidates, but didn't know anything about the judges I had to vote for in the judicial retention portion of the ballot. I even tried to find info on them. :(
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 11:27 pm (UTC)I know the name of the guy who got us a dog park here. Unfortunately, he's the "all about skypark" candidate, so he pushes development next to one neighborhood (raising its property values), without developing anything else. Still, I voted for him, because I like the dog park and am loyal to someone who campaigned on that ONE issue and got it within 2 years.
I know more about the issues than I do about the local candidates. I know that, even though the dems want me to vote yes on a bond for children's hospitals, I voted no, because it didn't seem well thought-out, and was really kind of sucky in terms of raising my taxes. I know that I resent having to float a bond to pay for basic emergency services-- that's what I pay the rest of my taxes for. I vote mostly democratic, but I also vote against the dems when I can see a really glaring flaw in the proposed bill or amendment or candidate platform.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 08:10 pm (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/users/metaldave/328913.html?thread=733393#t733393
Other voters also discussed local candidates and local initiatives with him.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 09:42 pm (UTC)Graham Leonard supports such organizations as the Sierra Club. That right there gets my attention. :-) He's also a Quaker, which is pretty close to my own "religion"...basically a nature-kid liberal Christian (to put it to someone who wants an outsider's oversimplified view of it).
He's a REALLY nice guy, intelligent, stands firm in his beliefs but is willing and ready to listen to others...yeah this is the kind of person I want in a government office. I would support him if he somehow manages to go further. I hope he wins in his race for Congress.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:48 pm (UTC)Even though I try to vote for who I like, and not staight Democratic, I still end up voting for mostly the Dems.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:52 pm (UTC)I'm not voting for him.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:55 pm (UTC)Yay!
I knew about my local candidates, but didn't know anything about the judges I had to vote for in the judicial retention portion of the ballot. I even tried to find info on them. :(
no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-31 11:27 pm (UTC)I know the name of the guy who got us a dog park here. Unfortunately, he's the "all about skypark" candidate, so he pushes development next to one neighborhood (raising its property values), without developing anything else. Still, I voted for him, because I like the dog park and am loyal to someone who campaigned on that ONE issue and got it within 2 years.
I know more about the issues than I do about the local candidates. I know that, even though the dems want me to vote yes on a bond for children's hospitals, I voted no, because it didn't seem well thought-out, and was really kind of sucky in terms of raising my taxes. I know that I resent having to float a bond to pay for basic emergency services-- that's what I pay the rest of my taxes for. I vote mostly democratic, but I also vote against the dems when I can see a really glaring flaw in the proposed bill or amendment or candidate platform.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 08:10 pm (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/users/metaldave/328913.html?thread=733393#t733393
Other voters also discussed local candidates and local initiatives with him.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-01 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-02 09:42 pm (UTC)Graham Leonard supports such organizations as the Sierra Club. That right there gets my attention. :-) He's also a Quaker, which is pretty close to my own "religion"...basically a nature-kid liberal Christian (to put it to someone who wants an outsider's oversimplified view of it).
He's a REALLY nice guy, intelligent, stands firm in his beliefs but is willing and ready to listen to others...yeah this is the kind of person I want in a government office. I would support him if he somehow manages to go further. I hope he wins in his race for Congress.