An Alternet article on Quiverfull
Dec. 4th, 2010 12:07 pmAnd let me just say that anybody who doesn't think that term is a little disturbing isn't thinking clearly about it. They're explicitly using a passage about having children like little arrows. If they were just about the kids, why not call themselves the "fruitful" movement?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-06 12:53 am (UTC)Sadly, I doubt more than about three hundred people would get it.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-06 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-06 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-17 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-06 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-07 08:37 am (UTC)I hate myself more for expecting better of a column on National Review.
Anyway, yes I would not have made the reference otherwise. >_>
no subject
Date: 2010-12-07 01:32 pm (UTC)Such is the way of things when pop culture is used to get people interested in actual historical events. If it weren't for the movie, I know I wouldn't have known about it, since it never was in my history classes. (It's a shame, too, because even though that battle technically had more than 300, they were still woefully outnumbered, and both it and the battle a year later were epic, despite that fact.)