The Big Orange Splot
Jan. 3rd, 2010 06:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A man who lives on a street where all the houses are the same repaints to be CRAZY AND FUNKY after a seagull drops a can of orange paint on his roof. And then, one by one, he convinces his neighbors to do the same. Good little book. But... is it fantasy?
Apparently, yes:
Age: Primary
Genre: Fantasy
Critique: This is fantasy because a man and everyone in his neighborhood does a complete remodel of their homes overnight. This is not realistic. This book is a good example of plot because it is clear and simple with a good ending.
Dear god. Maybe it's some special form of virus that only exists in this one (please, say it's not more than one!) classroom.
Apparently, yes:
Age: Primary
Genre: Fantasy
Critique: This is fantasy because a man and everyone in his neighborhood does a complete remodel of their homes overnight. This is not realistic. This book is a good example of plot because it is clear and simple with a good ending.
Dear god. Maybe it's some special form of virus that only exists in this one (please, say it's not more than one!) classroom.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 08:20 pm (UTC)I suppose it depends on how one defines fantasy. I myself don't think the animal-character genre counts as 'fantasy' - sorry, not even The Wind In The Willows, dearly as I love it. "Rabbits in waistcoats", y'know, characters that essentially lead ordinary human lives, even though they're supposedly bears or rabbits or whatever, and have a few animal characteristics laid on. Except for their supposed animal-ness, they're not extraordinary or magical, and their problems are ordinary human problems.
Contrast this with Gorky Rises (http://www.amazon.com/Gorky-Rises-William-Steig/dp/0374427844/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1262635383&sr=8-1), which I would classify as both animal-character (frogs in clothes, who do nothing notably froglike) and genuine fantasy. Not because frogs don't really talk and wear clothes, not because frogs don't really fly, and not because frogs probably don't really dream about flying, but because our protagonist Gorky (who just happens to be nominally a frog) has an extraordinary, magickal experience, that might have been just a dream, but on the other hand might have been actually happened.
That's the essence of fantasy, IMHO: something magic actually happens, or at least might have actually happened. The possibility is left open, not shut down with "but it was all nothing but a dream".
Speaking of frogs, I highly recommend Frog Goes To Dinner (http://www.amazon.com/Frog-Goes-Dinner-Boy-Dog/dp/0803728840/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1262636251&sr=1-1), which I would also classify as a genuine fantasy. Enjoy!