Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: (no subject)
- 2: Only 3 years and 3 weeks until the next Presidential Inauguration
- 3: Protest at Times Square at 2pm
- 4: Two PSAs
- 5: Happy NYE!
- 6: Soooooooooooooooo, people at /r/EnglishLearning will at least once a week
- 7: Finished Bee Speaker
- 8: (no subject)
- 9: Would my dog or cat really eat me if I died alone?
Style Credit
- Style: Dawn Flush for Compartmentalize by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-19 03:46 am (UTC)Given that the countries with the highest test scores in the world start their kids in play kindergarten at six or seven - seven! and they're not learning to read yet! - I think there's really something to this.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-29 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 03:51 am (UTC)At any rate, I view it this way. If starting at 4 means that you take three years to cover the material in such a way that all the children can grasp it (and you really stress out the slower kids) but starting at 6 means you can cover that same material in ONE year (and the kids aren't as stressed), why would you start earlier?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-31 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-31 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 05:18 pm (UTC)Remember, my mother was the one who got chewed out by my first-grade teacher because I already knew how to read. I literally cannot remember a time when I couldn't read. Cursive took me a bit, but once it was EXPLAINED instead of everyone just expecting me to magically know the different letter shapes from print, I picked it up in about a week.
I think a lot of people don't give children enough credit.