More politics
Mar. 24th, 2004 11:03 amSome of you may remember my longass post about how the Pledge is stupid and the American's Creed is better. If not, you can no doubt find it in my memories (I'm at 200 now! Go me!)
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000630.html
I love this person. Seriously.
If any further evidence is needed that the purpose of the Pledge of Allegiance is to inculcate mindless loyalty to the state, it can be found in the fact that many children clearly do not understand what they are saying. This can be seen in the eggcorns that they construct. My mother tells me that as a little girl she believed that there was a thing called a legiance that she was pledging to the flag. She didn't know what it was. In today's column in the New York Times, entitled Of God and the Flag, William Safire reports that as a little boy he thought that the Pledge began "I led the pigeons to the flag". In a roundabout way, I think he understood it all too well.
THAT'S EXACTLY MY POINT! Or one of them, anyway. It's wrong, dead wrong, to teach children to say big words they don't even understand, especially if you're expecting them to promise something. If they don't understand it, why should they say it? You're making them lie, even if they'd mean the sentiment. So, of course, by the time they understand what it means, they're just numbly reciting pitterpatterbabble. Stupid, really. If you're going to say something and not mean it, it might as well be something personal, like "I love you" or "I'm allergic to mushrooms".
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000630.html
I love this person. Seriously.
If any further evidence is needed that the purpose of the Pledge of Allegiance is to inculcate mindless loyalty to the state, it can be found in the fact that many children clearly do not understand what they are saying. This can be seen in the eggcorns that they construct. My mother tells me that as a little girl she believed that there was a thing called a legiance that she was pledging to the flag. She didn't know what it was. In today's column in the New York Times, entitled Of God and the Flag, William Safire reports that as a little boy he thought that the Pledge began "I led the pigeons to the flag". In a roundabout way, I think he understood it all too well.
THAT'S EXACTLY MY POINT! Or one of them, anyway. It's wrong, dead wrong, to teach children to say big words they don't even understand, especially if you're expecting them to promise something. If they don't understand it, why should they say it? You're making them lie, even if they'd mean the sentiment. So, of course, by the time they understand what it means, they're just numbly reciting pitterpatterbabble. Stupid, really. If you're going to say something and not mean it, it might as well be something personal, like "I love you" or "I'm allergic to mushrooms".
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 04:30 pm (UTC)the concept of the pledge is foreign to me. I'm Canadian, we just stand for the anthem. it seems so pointless.
I wonder what propelled this? "Hey, lets play "make kids say things they don't understand"! It'll be a national pastime! There'll be a contest!" Ten bucks says that the second-place entry was:
"Ampersand glooping cow-dun moo alabama-oxen nooo-PIIIEE! Superman flies in a monkey! I am a screeching owl! I mean eagle! Because the Eagle IS America! or a SYMBOL! OOOH YEA!" C'mon, nothing mixes pop culture, symbolism, amusing made-up words and lovely animals more to impress kindergarterers. Of course, the Superman reference caused so much trouble, since it was added-on later by a follower of Supermanism in the gov't, and is trying to promote a state religion, and who persecuted all the Gothamites.
Cause... y'know. Superman IS the leader of the most common religion in America. Or... summing like that.
[wow. most random comment ever. *slinks off*]
-Kimothy
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 05:09 pm (UTC)Oh, I love that. Sooooooo much.