Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Guess who's working the election next week!
- 2: OMGOMGOMG!!!!
- 3: Pizza activity spikes just before reports of Israel attacking Iran
- 4: (no subject)
- 5: (no subject)
- 6: Weirdly specific firefox question
- 7: "Is there anything you'd like to tell us about yourself?"
- 8: "I think the protagonist had hay fever or maybe yellow fever, I'm not sure which"
- 9: Oooh! Prodigy has a Mirror Universe episode!
Style Credit
- Style: Dawn Flush for Compartmentalize by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-02-05 08:49 am (UTC)It's funny that I often answer polls because it's less effort, but end up being more likely to comment anyway. Weird.
And for lj-cuts, I chose the "depends on the poster" answer, but it also sometimes depends on the content. I'll also click on cuts if the community is one I know (which is related to depending on the poster, I suppose) and the content seems to be interesting.
And I picked "other" for when I do lj-cuts because I'll also cut for TMI-ness/NWS-ness. Or is that the general interest option?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-05 08:54 am (UTC)And if I see that the link (for a link within LJ) goes to the reply page, I'm much less likely to click it. That's just manipulation.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-05 05:43 pm (UTC)I don't blame people for linking to the reply page. A lot of people don't realize they can get to their entries another way besides just clicking on "reply to this entry", nor that the URL can be changed to lead to the entry proper instead of the reply page.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-05 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-05 05:41 pm (UTC)I completely forgot worksafeness, tminess, and triggery-ness. They fit under "other", not "general interest".
It's not weird that you answer polls because they're easy, and then comment. It's a foot-in-the-door thing, isn't it? Once you take the small step of answering a poll, you're more likely to take the larger step of commenting. Mwa ha ha ha ha!