AAAARRRRGGGGHHH!
Nov. 25th, 2005 04:17 amMy god! You just can't get away from this sort of silliness!
So I leave
autism's insane discussion. It's not profitable to hang around there anymore. Losing my soul, I was!
And I meander over to
brits_americans to visit the Thanksgiving discussion. And it's there! Again! GAH!
Sometimes, I could just scream. The universe is most assuredly out to get me.
So I leave
And I meander over to
Sometimes, I could just scream. The universe is most assuredly out to get me.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 10:11 am (UTC)The reason? They're from America. They're not from India. It's less confusing to me, since I know people who have moved to the USA from India...and are thus "American Indians" I would suppose. :-p
Blame it on Columbus! X-D
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 12:42 pm (UTC)'Indian' to me means someone from India, either in terms of citizenship or ethnic origin.
The term I use for those people who've been on the North American continent longer than the Caucasians is "Amerindian", which I picked up in Anthropology.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 12:54 pm (UTC)I had a teacher who made us say "the indigenous peoples of North America" which is kinda long...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 12:38 am (UTC)A comment by Sherman Alexie in this article (http://www.fallsapart.com/art-lat.html):
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 03:46 pm (UTC)You do a good job presiding over the Internets
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 04:07 pm (UTC)Don't these people understand how STUPID it sounds? It works for some things-- I'm a woman with ADHD-- but I am not a woman with Cubanness. I am a Cuban woman. The "you just don't want to change the language" argument makes me want to scream. No, you don't get to change a language because it makes you feel more PC.
It really is possible to be too PC.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:25 pm (UTC)Apparently not. I agree, it should be used for terms that aren't adjectives. Special needs, for example, is not an adjective - you can't be a special needs student. You have to be a student with special needs. You can't be a wheelchair passenger, you are a passenger in a wheelchair*.
*But, saying "If you are a passenger who uses a wheelchair" three times in an announcement over the PA, that's absurd. Try "If you use a wheelchair..." instead, thanks. They all know they're passengers already.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 04:46 pm (UTC)Generally, I leave it up to the person. If he or she wants to be called an "Indian," then I'll call them an "Indian." If they prefer "first nations," then I'll call them that. Most, however, seem to prefer to use the name of the nation or band they belong to. "I am a member of the Haida nation," for example.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:26 pm (UTC)Oh, definitely - that's the only acceptable route.
Most, however, seem to prefer to use the name of the nation or band they belong to. "I am a member of the Haida nation," for example.
That's been my (rather limited, I admit) experience as well.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 10:11 am (UTC)The reason? They're from America. They're not from India. It's less confusing to me, since I know people who have moved to the USA from India...and are thus "American Indians" I would suppose. :-p
Blame it on Columbus! X-D
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 12:42 pm (UTC)'Indian' to me means someone from India, either in terms of citizenship or ethnic origin.
The term I use for those people who've been on the North American continent longer than the Caucasians is "Amerindian", which I picked up in Anthropology.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 12:54 pm (UTC)I had a teacher who made us say "the indigenous peoples of North America" which is kinda long...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 12:38 am (UTC)A comment by Sherman Alexie in this article (http://www.fallsapart.com/art-lat.html):
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 03:46 pm (UTC)You do a good job presiding over the Internets
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 04:07 pm (UTC)Don't these people understand how STUPID it sounds? It works for some things-- I'm a woman with ADHD-- but I am not a woman with Cubanness. I am a Cuban woman. The "you just don't want to change the language" argument makes me want to scream. No, you don't get to change a language because it makes you feel more PC.
It really is possible to be too PC.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:25 pm (UTC)Apparently not. I agree, it should be used for terms that aren't adjectives. Special needs, for example, is not an adjective - you can't be a special needs student. You have to be a student with special needs. You can't be a wheelchair passenger, you are a passenger in a wheelchair*.
*But, saying "If you are a passenger who uses a wheelchair" three times in an announcement over the PA, that's absurd. Try "If you use a wheelchair..." instead, thanks. They all know they're passengers already.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 04:46 pm (UTC)Generally, I leave it up to the person. If he or she wants to be called an "Indian," then I'll call them an "Indian." If they prefer "first nations," then I'll call them that. Most, however, seem to prefer to use the name of the nation or band they belong to. "I am a member of the Haida nation," for example.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 08:26 pm (UTC)Oh, definitely - that's the only acceptable route.
Most, however, seem to prefer to use the name of the nation or band they belong to. "I am a member of the Haida nation," for example.
That's been my (rather limited, I admit) experience as well.