I know a lot of people are going "I just don't care about the last book now". And some are going "OMG! BEST BOOK EVAH!"
*waits for both groups to converge*
I've been reading HP since the actual beginning, before the hype. Never liked the hype. It obscured several books which deserved more attention, set up a huge number of copycats, caused every friggin' fantasy book to be "If you like Harry Potter....", which sucks, because many of them are very different from HP.
And unlike books by some authors, I've never been dying to know what happens next with HP. Oh, I read it, but I'm not counting down the minutes. Hilari Bell, now... I want to read the last book in that trilogy so much.
*coughs*
As I was saying, I'm not that invested in the books. I think they're a nice bit of fun, and it's certainly fun to take them too seriously and analyse the shit out of them as you would with... well, for want of a better term, with real literature. One of these days I'll analyse Dick and Jane like that for fun. So I could hardly start crying that "I'm not that interested in them anymore", nor could I start declaring my undying love for them.
But I'll say this for the most recent book: It's the first one I've wanted to re-read so soon after getting it. I often enjoy books by reading them twice a day for weeks, until I get bored, then taking a break. I sometimes enjoy books by reading them only once, then not again. I usually (now that I'm not a kid anymore) enjoy them by reading them, waiting a while, then re-reading them. I read fast, it's not a problem for me to read a book several times.
Harry Potter has always been in the third category, except in cases where I was traveling and inexplicably only had Harry Potter with me. But now I want to re-read book 6. This is a good sign for JKR's writing. She still needs to find a better editor, one who will help her cut down her word count just a tiny bit (agreed totally on adverb abuse. This is why god invented descriptive verbs), but her writing is already vastly improved over even the last book. *nods*
So says me, anyway.
So, maybe I'll re-read it, after I finish this DWJ I never read (Merlin Conspiracy).
*waits for both groups to converge*
I've been reading HP since the actual beginning, before the hype. Never liked the hype. It obscured several books which deserved more attention, set up a huge number of copycats, caused every friggin' fantasy book to be "If you like Harry Potter....", which sucks, because many of them are very different from HP.
And unlike books by some authors, I've never been dying to know what happens next with HP. Oh, I read it, but I'm not counting down the minutes. Hilari Bell, now... I want to read the last book in that trilogy so much.
*coughs*
As I was saying, I'm not that invested in the books. I think they're a nice bit of fun, and it's certainly fun to take them too seriously and analyse the shit out of them as you would with... well, for want of a better term, with real literature. One of these days I'll analyse Dick and Jane like that for fun. So I could hardly start crying that "I'm not that interested in them anymore", nor could I start declaring my undying love for them.
But I'll say this for the most recent book: It's the first one I've wanted to re-read so soon after getting it. I often enjoy books by reading them twice a day for weeks, until I get bored, then taking a break. I sometimes enjoy books by reading them only once, then not again. I usually (now that I'm not a kid anymore) enjoy them by reading them, waiting a while, then re-reading them. I read fast, it's not a problem for me to read a book several times.
Harry Potter has always been in the third category, except in cases where I was traveling and inexplicably only had Harry Potter with me. But now I want to re-read book 6. This is a good sign for JKR's writing. She still needs to find a better editor, one who will help her cut down her word count just a tiny bit (agreed totally on adverb abuse. This is why god invented descriptive verbs), but her writing is already vastly improved over even the last book. *nods*
So says me, anyway.
So, maybe I'll re-read it, after I finish this DWJ I never read (Merlin Conspiracy).
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:34 pm (UTC)The hype really decreases my enjoyment of the books, but they're still quick, fun reads.
Maybe I'm just cruel, but I think that all of the people who are like, "OMG JKR is really not a good writer after all this sucks angst angst angst!" are hilarious. It's one of the fabulous things about reading a series as it is released: the fans grow up between books.
I still hate the fanfiction though. Sorry.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:37 pm (UTC)Librarian, pff. I just read it sitting in the borders at the WTC. I used to cut school and go there.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:35 pm (UTC)(I have MC and was not impressed with it, unfortunately. She seems to have a very strange pattern -- outside the Chrestomanci books -- of writing one obviously-DWJ book, then a sequel that sounds nothing like her. I'm really hoping Conrad's Fate is going to fall into the "sounds like DWJ" category rather than the other one.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:56 pm (UTC)"The Dynamics of Interbeing and Monological Imperatives
in Dick and Jane: A Study in Psychic Transrelational Gender Modes"
no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:55 am (UTC)I think it's the best of the series so far. I won't say more because I don't want to deal with trying to figure out what's a spoiler and what isn't.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 07:42 am (UTC)No matter what you post, if you put it behind a cut tag, nobody really has the right to bitch.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 04:05 pm (UTC)Call me crazy, but as much as I liked this one, it felt like a twisted rewrite of the last one in many ways. Too formulaic for my tastes. Yes, the writing was better, but it felt better in the same way a second or third draft of an essay would. It didn't really feel like a new book to me.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:34 pm (UTC)The hype really decreases my enjoyment of the books, but they're still quick, fun reads.
Maybe I'm just cruel, but I think that all of the people who are like, "OMG JKR is really not a good writer after all this sucks angst angst angst!" are hilarious. It's one of the fabulous things about reading a series as it is released: the fans grow up between books.
I still hate the fanfiction though. Sorry.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:37 pm (UTC)Librarian, pff. I just read it sitting in the borders at the WTC. I used to cut school and go there.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:35 pm (UTC)(I have MC and was not impressed with it, unfortunately. She seems to have a very strange pattern -- outside the Chrestomanci books -- of writing one obviously-DWJ book, then a sequel that sounds nothing like her. I'm really hoping Conrad's Fate is going to fall into the "sounds like DWJ" category rather than the other one.)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 11:56 pm (UTC)"The Dynamics of Interbeing and Monological Imperatives
in Dick and Jane: A Study in Psychic Transrelational Gender Modes"
no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:55 am (UTC)I think it's the best of the series so far. I won't say more because I don't want to deal with trying to figure out what's a spoiler and what isn't.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 07:42 am (UTC)No matter what you post, if you put it behind a cut tag, nobody really has the right to bitch.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 04:05 pm (UTC)Call me crazy, but as much as I liked this one, it felt like a twisted rewrite of the last one in many ways. Too formulaic for my tastes. Yes, the writing was better, but it felt better in the same way a second or third draft of an essay would. It didn't really feel like a new book to me.