Okay...

[conuly]

I know I post a *lot* of links. In fact, that's the bulk of my posts. The more I read, the more I try to lump them together, but I'm afraid that the more I lump them together, the less likely any link will be read, and I'm not posting them entirely for my own edification. And I can't just comment on all of the links, my sarcasm sense would burn out fast.

So. Um. About how many links have to be in a post before your eyes glaze over and you click on none of them? This isn't a poll, just a question.

Edit: What about if I stored up most of my links every day, and posted them in one swell foop, in a post divided into neat categories like "Civil rights" and "Politics" and "Reproductive rights" and stuff like that? There'd still be a lot of links, but it'd be easier to find the ones you're interested in, and I'd still be reducing the sheer volume of posts I make every day.

Comments

[feathered.livejournal.com]

I would find it much easier if they were all posted together rather than split up throughout the day. It sometimes annoys me ever so slightly that my friendslist is all your articles -- I have occassionally lost other peoples' posts within them. At the same time, I do read enough of your articles not to demand a filter or to filter you off my friendslist. Posting your links in one or two big posts a day would be a really neat way to solve my only issues with them, so I quite like the idea.