Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Does anybody have old magazines?
- 2: I also didn’t expect
- 3: (no subject)
- 4: Two PSAs
- 5: Well, I dealt with my shock and horror by getting into a very stupid flamewar at /r/englishlearning
- 6: Only 3 years and 3 weeks until the next Presidential Inauguration
- 7: Protest at Times Square at 2pm
- 8: Happy NYE!
- 9: Soooooooooooooooo, people at /r/EnglishLearning will at least once a week
Style Credit
- Style: Dawn Flush for Compartmentalize by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Hmmm...
Date: 2005-05-11 12:47 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how I feel about the nature vs. nurture debate when it comes to dogs. Some dogs are genuinely born with aggressive tendencies, especially male dogs. By "agressive" I don't mean "vicious" or "mean" or "dangerous" but, well...agressive! With no insinuations. Some breeds have a tendency towards aggressiveness, and I believe AmStaffs are one of these breeds. That's hard to disagree with, though - this breed was originally bred for fighting or hunting or purposes which required aggressive and at times violent behavior. Those traits got passed down through generations as breeders selected the dogs which were best at these activities. Some of that has dissipated, as AmStaffs are becoming more and more frequently companion or otherwise nonsporting dogs. Still, their history remains. This aggression, which is natural to some, is thwarted by bad owners and breeders who want to create malicious dogs.
And on a side note...I've only met sweet chihuahuas, but maybe my friends are just better owners then the people who've raised those "vicious" ones!
Regarding dalmations - totally agreed. I don't think people realized this after 101 Dalmations came out and so a lot of those Christmas present puppies ended up at shelters.
Re: Hmmm...
Date: 2005-05-11 02:01 pm (UTC)That would be it :)
And on a side note...I've only met sweet chihuahuas, but maybe my friends are just better owners then the people who've raised those "vicious" ones!
Probably. I think some of the reason those dogs tend to be nasty is because people don't train them at all, thinking them cute dogs. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Regarding dalmations - totally agreed. I don't think people realized this after 101 Dalmations came out and so a lot of those Christmas present puppies ended up at shelters.
Especially as a lot of them came from puppy mills, which we all know suck.
Re: Hmmm...
Date: 2005-05-11 07:01 pm (UTC)And yes, making an overarching statement about the whole breed ... especially in such a way is horrible. Sure, it's fine to say FOOs tend to be more BAR, so a FOO might suit you better. But to make people get rid of all pitbulls... that's horrible.
Most vicious animal I ever encountered was a rabbit. We don't know why. Eventually it had to be euthanized because it couldn't even be fed without risk of it attacking.. Since it clearly couldn't be kept safely, an attempt was made to release it into the wild as the person lived in a mostly wilderness area anyway. It stayed around and then tried to attack a child.
The second most vicious animal I've ever encountered was a purebred cat. It was hypothesized that she was just perpetually angry and ill-tempered because she was removed from her mother too young. She was my family's cat until one night I (about 4 or 5 years old at the time) woke up screaming as she had clawed me and drawn blood. She was given to a breeder, where she was kept and bred, but she wasn't suitable as a pet for anyone. She also destroyed a bunch of my sister's clothes, but my family had put up with that, it was attacking a person in her sleep that crossed the line.
But I don't blame cats or rabbits for these examples. Most cats I've met are wonderful, and I love them.