No.. I didn't. And I think I also unfairly judged firefox...
hmmm, my style is only a very, very slightly modified version of the default style it's based on. It's not a custom style. It's umm clean and simple, I think, but with a modified number of entries per page. So, I think the problem is with the LJ style itself. You may want to test that and let the styles admins know so they can file a bug.
I think my lothario considered switching me over to firefox, we tried it out. I saw it didn't work right with tabbed browsing, so we didn't switch me over. But if it was my style that was broken (and I probably did test it out on my LJ) then it wasn't the version of FireFox I had that was the problem.
How to test it - toss a test journal into magazine (I just looked it up, and magazine is the style I use) and don't add any modifications or whatnot and see if your browser works with that or not. If it does, it's my customizations, if it doesn't, it's the style.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-04 01:04 pm (UTC)hmmm, my style is only a very, very slightly modified version of the default style it's based on. It's not a custom style. It's umm clean and simple, I think, but with a modified number of entries per page. So, I think the problem is with the LJ style itself. You may want to test that and let the styles admins know so they can file a bug.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-04 01:07 pm (UTC)What do you mean, "unfairly judged firefox"?
How do I test that? Can't I just send in a support request without testing?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-04 01:13 pm (UTC)How to test it - toss a test journal into magazine (I just looked it up, and magazine is the style I use) and don't add any modifications or whatnot and see if your browser works with that or not. If it does, it's my customizations, if it doesn't, it's the style.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-04 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-04 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-04 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-04 01:27 pm (UTC)