Is it just because Latin is cool? Or is there some reason for it? Would spells from other countries sound different... ooh! Does that mean that maybe Chinese people have completely different spells, or even that there's some language difficulties - no "translation" for reparo, you have to do something different, but they have a spell that wouldn't exist in England...?
On a tangentially-related note, despite whatever you have heard, alea iacta est does *not* mean "the die is cast". Latin has a really messed up tense system. Third principle part + is = has been. Don't ask me why. So "alea iacta est" means that the die has been cast, not that it is cast.
On a tangentially-related note, despite whatever you have heard, alea iacta est does *not* mean "the die is cast". Latin has a really messed up tense system. Third principle part + is = has been. Don't ask me why. So "alea iacta est" means that the die has been cast, not that it is cast.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:37 pm (UTC)And the different spell thing is interesting. Would they just have the same spells with different names - is there a discrete set of things magic can do, so that every culture would have the same spells (except maybe for ones they hadn't discovered yet), or are there more possibilities (like the almost-Reparo you suggest) and wizards limited by the accepted range of spells?
It's fun thinking way too hard about this stuff. :D
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:40 pm (UTC)Magical kids have a *lot* of potential. Harry can blow up his aunt, make his hair grow, apparate (or fly, I'm not sure which) to the top of a tall building... with no training or apparent effort.
Then they go to school, and learn spells. They need wands to do spells (look at how "wandless magic" is a common sue-trait!). They can *only* do the spells. Spells are difficult.
It seems to me that maybe the spells help them focus, so their magic is predictable - but it has the not-necessarily-unintentional side effect of limiting their capabilities - we certainly don't hear of wandless magic from adults.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:this is all quite irrelevant
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 12:52 am (UTC)Personally I think it's aesthetics. Mangled latin sounds pretty, sounds important, and because most people have a tiny spattering of it, makes it fun to figure out.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 09:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 04:39 am (UTC)The wordplay section of the site is also fun.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 04:44 am (UTC)Hey! Be careful whose grammar you diss... mainly because I think German works the same way. I.e. "er ist gegangen" doesn't mean "he is gone" but "he has gone".
And I think the question of the importance of the spells is an interesting one. I don't really have an answer to it either, though. I used to think that actually saying the spell out loud was essential to doing focused magic, but then that Death Eater in OOTP came along and cursed Hermione while he was silenced, so... *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 08:38 am (UTC)Now, all the miracles and stuff that happen in the church are pretty special, and seem magical. Since they speak Latin before doing that, most people assumed that it was also the language that was important with these things.
So then Latin is associated with the mystical and magical, and so that's the language you've got to use. And since it's a tradition within the genre, you've obviously got to use it.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 09:02 am (UTC)My theory is that the spells themselves are nothing more than a focusing agent. Look at Snape - all he has to do is wave his wand, or make a vague guesture and shutters and windows close. And Harry inflates his aunt without even knowing what it is that he's doing - not to mention, he "willed" a snake free in the first book.
The more adept the wizard is at the use of magic, the less spells he or she uses.
And in other areas of the world, I would imagine they use their native tongue. In fantasy work in Asia, Sanskrit is the most common (that I've seen) "spell language", being used freely there much like Rowling uses Latin. Again, it's more a focusing agent than anything else, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 07:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 01:19 pm (UTC)http://www.jkrowling.com/textonly/news_view.cfm?id=80
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 01:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 07:23 am (UTC)Apart from that Latin spells have a tradition, many "real" spells from the middle-ages that you find books are in Latin.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:37 pm (UTC)And the different spell thing is interesting. Would they just have the same spells with different names - is there a discrete set of things magic can do, so that every culture would have the same spells (except maybe for ones they hadn't discovered yet), or are there more possibilities (like the almost-Reparo you suggest) and wizards limited by the accepted range of spells?
It's fun thinking way too hard about this stuff. :D
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 10:40 pm (UTC)Magical kids have a *lot* of potential. Harry can blow up his aunt, make his hair grow, apparate (or fly, I'm not sure which) to the top of a tall building... with no training or apparent effort.
Then they go to school, and learn spells. They need wands to do spells (look at how "wandless magic" is a common sue-trait!). They can *only* do the spells. Spells are difficult.
It seems to me that maybe the spells help them focus, so their magic is predictable - but it has the not-necessarily-unintentional side effect of limiting their capabilities - we certainly don't hear of wandless magic from adults.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:this is all quite irrelevant
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 12:52 am (UTC)Personally I think it's aesthetics. Mangled latin sounds pretty, sounds important, and because most people have a tiny spattering of it, makes it fun to figure out.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 09:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 04:39 am (UTC)The wordplay section of the site is also fun.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 04:44 am (UTC)Hey! Be careful whose grammar you diss... mainly because I think German works the same way. I.e. "er ist gegangen" doesn't mean "he is gone" but "he has gone".
And I think the question of the importance of the spells is an interesting one. I don't really have an answer to it either, though. I used to think that actually saying the spell out loud was essential to doing focused magic, but then that Death Eater in OOTP came along and cursed Hermione while he was silenced, so... *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 08:38 am (UTC)Now, all the miracles and stuff that happen in the church are pretty special, and seem magical. Since they speak Latin before doing that, most people assumed that it was also the language that was important with these things.
So then Latin is associated with the mystical and magical, and so that's the language you've got to use. And since it's a tradition within the genre, you've obviously got to use it.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 09:02 am (UTC)My theory is that the spells themselves are nothing more than a focusing agent. Look at Snape - all he has to do is wave his wand, or make a vague guesture and shutters and windows close. And Harry inflates his aunt without even knowing what it is that he's doing - not to mention, he "willed" a snake free in the first book.
The more adept the wizard is at the use of magic, the less spells he or she uses.
And in other areas of the world, I would imagine they use their native tongue. In fantasy work in Asia, Sanskrit is the most common (that I've seen) "spell language", being used freely there much like Rowling uses Latin. Again, it's more a focusing agent than anything else, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 07:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 01:19 pm (UTC)http://www.jkrowling.com/textonly/news_view.cfm?id=80
no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 01:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-03-24 07:23 am (UTC)Apart from that Latin spells have a tradition, many "real" spells from the middle-ages that you find books are in Latin.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-26 07:31 am (UTC)