Date: 2005-03-22 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
*blinks* I think this is the third article I've read today - each posted by a completely different LJ user, each on a totally different topic where the article actually lacks any sort of cogent argument or totally misunderstands itself.

The drug use one, it says over and over again that the current generation of parents used drugs and were fine, so they're not worried about drug use in their kids. But things have changed. Mainly, we view drugs differently now. So, drugs are dangerous. Tell your kids they are dangerous. And your kids may have used marijuana, and so you're in denial about whether you need to talk to your kids about drugs even though you believe marijuana use in moderation isn't harmful, you're wrong because things have changed.

What's changed? It doesn't explain except to make reference to use of painkillers/cough syrup etc. but with no explanation of why that matters, and to say our views have changed.

You can't argue that it's more physically dangerous just because we view it as such with no evidence.

*sighs*

Yes, drug use can be dangerous. Yes, some people will die from it (although I do wonder how many of them are not dying from other things like suicide because of the drug use). But that doesn't mean there's no such thing as recreational drug use or every kid who tries marijuana is doomed or you need to tell your children such things. I'm all for talking to kids, but I'd be honest. And I'd tell them that some drugs are more dangerous than others. A message that often gets lost. That just because marijana didn't ruin your life doesn't mean you should try crack or heroin.

Date: 2005-03-22 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
That is one of the reasons I wouldn't want to lie to any children of mine.

My sister's approach (her children are still very young, the oldest is ummm 8 I think now) was to say: Drugs are powerful. They are often good and helpful, and we use them carefully when we're sick. But drugs can be dangerous if misused, so you have to know how to use them safely.

None of this all drugs are bad... but we'll ignore the fact that there's caffeine in your chocolate bar and coco cola the school gave you. Or all drugs are bad, but your aunts certainly do enjoy a nice glass of wine now and then. All drugs are bad, but you have to take your antibiotics now.

Honesty - novel concept.

oh and the gilded age article just makes me sad.

Date: 2005-03-22 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fascinoma.livejournal.com
They left out the fact that "Hollywood Kabbalah" founded by Philip Berg isn't even the real thing. This version of Kabbalah has to do with Jewish Kabbalah and Judaism what Jehovah's Witnesses have to do with mainstream Christianity.

According to Kabbalah, lesbianism does not create the same intensity of a spiritual short-circuit as gay sex because no semen is spilled into the open. Semen is the closest substance on earth to the Light of the Creator. For this reason it creates pleasure and it creates life. If it is exposed, negative forces immediately latch onto it. Thus, the negative forces are strengthened in the world. Lesbianism, however, does not create Light or Life. Therefore, though there is no spilling of a man's seed, there is no creation of Light and Life. Thus, the action only serves our interest and for this reason, is not endorsed.

This quote just made me laugh, it sounds that freakin' stupid.

Date: 2005-03-22 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fjorab-teke.livejournal.com
I'm only commenting on the one on Kabbalah...

I'm seriously going to have to talk to Mom about this religion she's so interested in. That piece of it is SO unlike her. And...yikes! I guess the people who follow Kabbalah must think boys and men who experince wet dreams are of TEH EBIL!!

Date: 2005-03-22 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
*blinks* I think this is the third article I've read today - each posted by a completely different LJ user, each on a totally different topic where the article actually lacks any sort of cogent argument or totally misunderstands itself.

The drug use one, it says over and over again that the current generation of parents used drugs and were fine, so they're not worried about drug use in their kids. But things have changed. Mainly, we view drugs differently now. So, drugs are dangerous. Tell your kids they are dangerous. And your kids may have used marijuana, and so you're in denial about whether you need to talk to your kids about drugs even though you believe marijuana use in moderation isn't harmful, you're wrong because things have changed.

What's changed? It doesn't explain except to make reference to use of painkillers/cough syrup etc. but with no explanation of why that matters, and to say our views have changed.

You can't argue that it's more physically dangerous just because we view it as such with no evidence.

*sighs*

Yes, drug use can be dangerous. Yes, some people will die from it (although I do wonder how many of them are not dying from other things like suicide because of the drug use). But that doesn't mean there's no such thing as recreational drug use or every kid who tries marijuana is doomed or you need to tell your children such things. I'm all for talking to kids, but I'd be honest. And I'd tell them that some drugs are more dangerous than others. A message that often gets lost. That just because marijana didn't ruin your life doesn't mean you should try crack or heroin.

Date: 2005-03-22 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
That is one of the reasons I wouldn't want to lie to any children of mine.

My sister's approach (her children are still very young, the oldest is ummm 8 I think now) was to say: Drugs are powerful. They are often good and helpful, and we use them carefully when we're sick. But drugs can be dangerous if misused, so you have to know how to use them safely.

None of this all drugs are bad... but we'll ignore the fact that there's caffeine in your chocolate bar and coco cola the school gave you. Or all drugs are bad, but your aunts certainly do enjoy a nice glass of wine now and then. All drugs are bad, but you have to take your antibiotics now.

Honesty - novel concept.

oh and the gilded age article just makes me sad.

Date: 2005-03-22 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fascinoma.livejournal.com
They left out the fact that "Hollywood Kabbalah" founded by Philip Berg isn't even the real thing. This version of Kabbalah has to do with Jewish Kabbalah and Judaism what Jehovah's Witnesses have to do with mainstream Christianity.

According to Kabbalah, lesbianism does not create the same intensity of a spiritual short-circuit as gay sex because no semen is spilled into the open. Semen is the closest substance on earth to the Light of the Creator. For this reason it creates pleasure and it creates life. If it is exposed, negative forces immediately latch onto it. Thus, the negative forces are strengthened in the world. Lesbianism, however, does not create Light or Life. Therefore, though there is no spilling of a man's seed, there is no creation of Light and Life. Thus, the action only serves our interest and for this reason, is not endorsed.

This quote just made me laugh, it sounds that freakin' stupid.

Date: 2005-03-22 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fjorab-teke.livejournal.com
I'm only commenting on the one on Kabbalah...

I'm seriously going to have to talk to Mom about this religion she's so interested in. That piece of it is SO unlike her. And...yikes! I guess the people who follow Kabbalah must think boys and men who experince wet dreams are of TEH EBIL!!

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324 25 2627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 10:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios