In fact, that's how it is in most of the United States. Either the employer or the employee can terminate the employment arrangement at any time for any reason, except reasons that are explicitly forbidden by law (e.g., race or religion).
Yes, the theory is that if you fire people stupidly, you won't do as well as a business. This is, however, one of the reasons I feel moral boycotts are vital in the US. The other is that corporations have far too much political power, so I want to boycott the ones I feel are most dangerous to lessen their political influence.
In fact, that's how it is in most of the United States. Either the employer or the employee can terminate the employment arrangement at any time for any reason, except reasons that are explicitly forbidden by law (e.g., race or religion).
Yes, the theory is that if you fire people stupidly, you won't do as well as a business. This is, however, one of the reasons I feel moral boycotts are vital in the US. The other is that corporations have far too much political power, so I want to boycott the ones I feel are most dangerous to lessen their political influence.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:12 pm (UTC)An exam I took years ago included, in a source, the sentence "allowed employees to sack people." Think that was a mistake ;0)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-14 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 02:12 pm (UTC)An exam I took years ago included, in a source, the sentence "allowed employees to sack people." Think that was a mistake ;0)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-10 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-14 10:40 am (UTC)