Date: 2005-03-07 07:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dkmnow.livejournal.com
There was/is a helluva lot more at stake in the exploitation of 9/11 than just Iraq (I know you know that - I'm just sayin'). Even so, I agree, at present it still appears highly unlikely that the Neocons were active participants in bringing about 9/11. But I'm not sure I'd dismiss it as ludicrous. The more I learn about these people, the less surprised I will be at anything they might pull, no matter how horrific.

At this point, the only thing that will really surprise me is if they do something so utterly inept as to significantly turn their own power-base against them. But right now, they're pissing off the AARP pretty badly. That's not a bad start.

We can only hope.

Date: 2005-03-07 08:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dkmnow.livejournal.com
I tend to disagree, there. With the right conditions in place, I doubt it would have taken more that two or three BushCorp insiders (in the right places) to bring it about. But were that the case, I seriously doubt that Bush himself would have known about it. Rove is another story.

Highly unlikely, but not quite ludicrous.

As for any medium- or large-scale conspiracy - nah! All the reports from credible insiders who have blown whistle to whatever degree are limited to evidence of incompetence beforehand, and exploitation and corruption after the fact.

Unless Ray McGovern and his brethren are disinformants...but I seriously doubt it.

For now.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324 25 26 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 10:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios