And Peterson was sentenced to death...
Dec. 14th, 2004 02:53 pmWhy? Because the evidence was so compelling?
No.
He didn't show enough emotion during the trial.
(Thanks,
rpeate)
Okay, youse guys can now talk about how horrible it is, because I'm too cold to do so.
No.
He didn't show enough emotion during the trial.
(Thanks,
Okay, youse guys can now talk about how horrible it is, because I'm too cold to do so.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 01:41 pm (UTC)"The evidence was circumstantial from the start, but the jurors said a few simple truths stood out. The bodies of Laci Peterson and the couple's unborn son washed up near where Scott Peterson said he had been fishing the day she was reported missing. Peterson told a web of lies to those around him. that death was the right sentence for Peterson because he had betrayed the woman closest to him and the unborn son whose name the couple had already chosen."
Reading, it's fun.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 01:48 pm (UTC)Side note, please do *not* type in strong, or whatever that is, because it really fucks up my monitor, no I don't know why.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 02:41 pm (UTC)I don't pretend to know everything, because I was not a juror, but it's obvious to anyone with common sense what happened. He was found guilty because he IS.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 03:37 pm (UTC)*baffled*
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 05:10 pm (UTC)Also, the whole "he was found guilty because he IS" is not the issue. That is what you seem to not understand, and that lack of understanding makes you look mockably foolish. The issue is not guilt, but rather the decision to kill, and the reasons behind the decision to kill.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 02:48 pm (UTC)