And Peterson was sentenced to death...
Dec. 14th, 2004 02:53 pmWhy? Because the evidence was so compelling?
No.
He didn't show enough emotion during the trial.
(Thanks,
rpeate)
Okay, youse guys can now talk about how horrible it is, because I'm too cold to do so.
No.
He didn't show enough emotion during the trial.
(Thanks,
Okay, youse guys can now talk about how horrible it is, because I'm too cold to do so.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 05:26 pm (UTC)As for the characteristics he displays, *if* he killed her AND feels no remorse or emotion, I'd agree. However, we have no way of getting inside his head, short of a statement along the lines of "yeah, I killed her, and I'd do it again, damn that felt good". All we've got are interpretations of his behaviour which may be flawed.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 05:48 pm (UTC)can I be an expert?
Date: 2004-12-14 06:13 pm (UTC)I don't think affect should be the cause of any greater or lesser punishment, but of course it is. In "How to Win Friends and Influence People," Dale Carnage tells how to appeal to authorities' sense of justice, and in "The Naked Ape" Desmond Morris tells how to pull of the primate behavios of submission to get out of tickets.
Like it or not, jury trials are acts... improvisational theatre with serious consequences. Sociopaths, strangely enough, often have better acting ability then us autistics. I'm lucky enough to have some (2.5 years) actor's training, but like the French I studied at the same time, I'm pretty sure it's not enough to matter in the real world. I make up for my natural lack of affect with some traits of Hystrionic Personality Disorder. :)