And Peterson was sentenced to death...
Dec. 14th, 2004 02:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
conuly
Why? Because the evidence was so compelling?
No.
He didn't show enough emotion during the trial.
(Thanks,![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
rpeate)
Okay, youse guys can now talk about how horrible it is, because I'm too cold to do so.
No.
He didn't show enough emotion during the trial.
(Thanks,
rpeate)Okay, youse guys can now talk about how horrible it is, because I'm too cold to do so.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-12-14 03:04 pm (UTC)I agree. Sort of. I agree with the death penalty in principle, but when it comes to fact? I really don't have any trouble with frying someone who did something really heinous, but at the same time who are we to decide this person has to die? Also, I'm not really comfortable with killing someone who might be innocent.
IMO, there is not enough evidence that this person is guilty. It seems a pretty shaky case all over, and order his death even based on that alone just is Not On.