I have a question!
Oct. 2nd, 2004 12:03 amI go barefoot. A lot. Every chance I get, in fact. I hate shoes. Now, for years people told me to cut it out because "you might step in glass or something, and die of tetnus". (They eventually stopped. I think they got tired of always being wrong). I'd always reply, reasonably, that I didn't see any glass, and that if they could show me some glass I'd be careful to walk around it. This always, ALWAYS prompted/prompts the response:
Well, there could be glass!
I don't understand that. There is no glass. Look up the street. No glass. Look down the street. No glass. Simple observation will tell you that there is far less glass on the street than most people commonly believe. Were there glass, one could easily walk around it, the same way one walks around dropped toys and other dropped... things. I am neither blind nor stupid. I am perfectly capable of seeing obstacles on the ground and not walking on them. However, it does not matter. There is never any glass. I have seen glass on the sidewalk so rarely that I can actually list up the times. And most of the times, the glass was right up against a building, not in the middle of the path.
What confuses me is that, when confronted with one of life's harsh realities, namely the fact that there isn't any glass, people always say "but there could be!" as though this means I should take excess precautions where there clearly isn't any glass (or rusty nails, or lit cigarettes....)!
Why do they do this? Why don't they say something else? I'd even "what would you do if there were?", because that opens some sort of discussion (not much, what I'd do is walk around it). But not only do they expect me, apparently, to protect my feet against imaginary dangers, they also don't like me looking around and pointing out that these dangers don't exist! And I just don't understand that.
Well, there could be glass!
I don't understand that. There is no glass. Look up the street. No glass. Look down the street. No glass. Simple observation will tell you that there is far less glass on the street than most people commonly believe. Were there glass, one could easily walk around it, the same way one walks around dropped toys and other dropped... things. I am neither blind nor stupid. I am perfectly capable of seeing obstacles on the ground and not walking on them. However, it does not matter. There is never any glass. I have seen glass on the sidewalk so rarely that I can actually list up the times. And most of the times, the glass was right up against a building, not in the middle of the path.
What confuses me is that, when confronted with one of life's harsh realities, namely the fact that there isn't any glass, people always say "but there could be!" as though this means I should take excess precautions where there clearly isn't any glass (or rusty nails, or lit cigarettes....)!
Why do they do this? Why don't they say something else? I'd even "what would you do if there were?", because that opens some sort of discussion (not much, what I'd do is walk around it). But not only do they expect me, apparently, to protect my feet against imaginary dangers, they also don't like me looking around and pointing out that these dangers don't exist! And I just don't understand that.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 08:59 pm (UTC)Still, I do not believe in shoes.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:03 pm (UTC)Fuck their stupidity.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:04 pm (UTC)Didn't bother with a shot, just pulled the thorn out.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:05 pm (UTC)It doesn't stop me from going barefoot occasionally, when my flip-flops hurt my feet.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:06 pm (UTC)MY SHOE DID NOT PROTECT MY FOOT.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:07 pm (UTC)Oh, seriously. I'm smart enough to avoid doggydo, but not other things?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:08 pm (UTC)The thorn just went in a bit and hurt. Wow.
How thick were your soles? A lot of people wear hard or thick soles. Bad for the feet, but maybe more protection in their minds?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:08 pm (UTC)So, now you have at least one person that is urging you to go barefoot!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:17 pm (UTC)I took off the sock and saw a puncture wound on the bottom of my foot. Based on the length of the nail I saw, and the fact that my shoe was flush to the level of the wood out of which it came, I can tell you it must have come within a half-inch of the top of my foot.
My soles were standard 'Eighties sneaker soles, perhaps Nike.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:27 pm (UTC)I told my family, we went to the hospital, they gave me a tetanus shot, said there was nothing more they could do, and my family and I went home. That was it. The wound closed, leaving a small scar. For all I know there's still rust and mud in my foot.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:30 pm (UTC)that's it after 28 years of barefootedness. but if I feel I need the extra protection? I wear sandles.. which cause inmy mind more injuries to me.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 09:45 pm (UTC)so you're safe statistically it's highly unlikely that you'll set on "street Glass"
A theory...
Date: 2004-10-01 09:55 pm (UTC)It's like a story I once heard: A girl sees her momma cut the roast in two halves before the woman puts it in the oven. She asks her momma "Why'd you cut the roast in half?" and the mother goes "I did it because my mother did. Why don't you go ask her why she did it?" so the little girl goes to the grandmother and asks her why she did it and the grandmother goes "I don't know. My mother did it. Go ask her." So the little girl goes to her great-grandmother and asks "Why did you cut the roast in two halves before putting it in the oven?" and the great-grandmother says "Because my oven was too small for the roast as a whole." XD And those women mindlessly carried on that tradition for no other reason except what they saw their mother do.
Maybe it's like that with the whole "ZOMG! You'll get glass/nails/tetanus/
the wrath of Satanon your foot! AND DIE!" Maybe in the earlier days it applied more, but not now. And maybe people got so used to the warning that they still apply it today.As for me, I'm a born and bred country girl. Been barefoot most of my life! The only time something impaled my foot is when I stepped on a honeybee. It stung my heel and I didn't notice anything walking until I felt heat in my heel. I turned it upwards and there was a struggling insect on it. I screamed and went inside and had my grandparents and mother take it out. They were like "That's what you get for not wearing shoes!"
XD;
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 10:10 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, if I go somewhere I'm going to do a lot of walking, I have to wear shoes cos I have a talipes foot & wear splints to correct.
I was only in danger of glass in my feet when I used to go clubbing a lot at 18-20.
The biggest danger around here is duck poo(hard to see sometimes as it's green & quite liquid). It washes off easily enough, though.
I say go barefoot as you have none of those issues as far as I know.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 10:51 pm (UTC)And then there's the time he was in college and jumped out of bed onto his exacto knife.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-02 05:45 am (UTC)