This is a new one to me:

[conuly]

"close be-hide" for "close behind".

*********************

How Disney Propaganda Shaped Life on the Home Front During WWII

Photos of yesterday's "supermoon"

AC/DC - Thunderstruck Guzheng Cover (video)

You never saw anything more true than this comic

Two pig heart transplants succeed in brain-dead recipients

Did Khutulun and Other Warrior Women Actually Fight in the Mongol Army?

Secret schools enable Afghanistan's teen girls to skirt Taliban's education ban

Surfing scientists hunt microplastics off Spanish beaches

The sustainable cities made from mud

Descendants of possible Tulsa massacre victims can give DNA

The U.S. student population is more diverse, but schools are still highly segregated

Why disasters are getting more severe but killing fewer people

The ‘worst variant’ is here

Republicans in Congress lay groundwork for anti-transgender push

Turpin children ‘failed’ by Southern California social services, report says

West seeks to coordinate evidence of war crimes in Ukraine

In Ukraine war, a race to acquire smarter, deadlier drones

The children who survived Uvalde massacre are heartbroken they couldn’t save their friends. Their moms now worry about their future

Comments

[kengr]

It's yet another example of folks who have only *heard* a phrase, never *read* it.

Like "next store" or "honing in"

[marahmarie]

I actually pronounce it this way ("next store") as that's what I heard when people said it around me as I was growing up.

[archersangel]

sometimes i say behint, which is apparently scots meaning behind. but i would never spell it like that.

[readerjane]

That form could be useful if you wanted something in-between “behind” and “beside”. Like when one horse overtakes another in a race.

[marahmarie]

"close be-hide" for "close behind"

A deep-seeded dilemna for sure :/

[conuly]

It's always a good idea to spell out your sarcasm.

Funny you should say that...

[marahmarie]

I was thinking about just this thing when I edited it - like, is it a good idea to spell out my sarcasm because of say, stereotypes around my education or lack thereof, or because no one will get it if I don't, people will just generally think I don't know how certain phrases are worded and/or how to spell?

And if it's the latter, what presumptions do I seem to be making about the intelligence of my/our readership? That they're not smart enough to see that I a) I misworded and/or misspelled anything up there or b) that they *are* smart enough to see it but not smart enough to know I did it on purpose?

And all of this is why I hate seeing others use or using the s/ tag myself, The End.

Re: Funny you should say that...

[conuly]

Yeah, but on the flipside, people miss sarcasm ALL THE TIME and it's always annoying on all sides when that happens.

Re: Funny you should say that...

[marahmarie]

Well, if the intended sarcasm comes off as malicious then yeah, that's worse than annoying, it's a battlefield. People do this in talking, too, they don't get sarcasm, and it can just rip things apart in ways the sarcastic person might not have intended (unless they're being passively-aggressively sarcastic, in which case we're talking turtles all the way down).

But for light/obviously non-aggressive repartee as seen above sometimes I think it just adds too many layers of complexity to even have to denote that it's sarcasm! That said, I did it anyhow *sigh*