conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
These are, of course, the tacos in the hard shell.

There is a really pesky contingent of people on the internet - and, I presume, in real life as well - who is proud to vocally proclaim that Americans just have no native food culture. Most of these people have never been to the US, of course.

Italians are the worst for this, in my experience, and their usual arguments follow two illogical pathways.

The first runs "Americans can't make $FOOD correctly, because their version of $FOOD is totally different from the version my grandma makes."

I say "fuck this shit". American spaghetti, American tacos, American Swedish meatballs, American beef pepper steak - all this might be very different from whatever the ancestral foods were that were brought here by immigrants, but when those selfsame immigrants looked around and saw that they couldn't get all the same things as at home, they did what immigrants have always done and they adapted. They picked up new ideas from their neighbors with different customs and foodways as well. And yeah, some of the foods they came up with were different from the ones their own grandparents ate, but guess what? Unless you're reading from 1875 cookbooks, your recipes have changed a little too. This idea that Americans changed it but people back home didn't is ludicrous.

The second is even more inane, and it runs "Apples are from Europe and so is wheat and so is butter, so apple pie isn't American and neither are all sorts of food".

First, none of those things are from Europe, and neither are the spices. Apples are from Asia, wheat is from the Fertile Crescent, and... idk who first invented cattle herding, much less butter, and I don't want to google it, but whatever. Secondly, whoever-it-is probably eats potatoes, or tomatoes, or peppers, and considers food made with those things integral to their own culture and guess what?

This argument is ridiculous no matter how it's made, and it drives me up the freaking wall. My breakfast bialy is no less authentic just because they technically make it differently in Bialystok. It's an authentic New York bialy.

Date: 2020-12-07 06:10 am (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
Six generations ago is about when the American versions split off.

Date: 2020-12-07 06:46 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
I figure it's like biological evolution. Biologists are at pains to say that humans aren't descended from apes, but that both are descended from a common ancestor. But if you had a live example of that common ancestor here to look at, you'd say it was an ape.

Date: 2020-12-08 05:41 am (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
No, that's not proper terminology. The third term you're looking for in your series of five is "hominoid" (as distinct from hominid). Apes are one subset of hominoid, humans are another.

But it doesn't matter, as long as you take the point that the analogy was intended to make: that in these cases, of two descendants one remaining in the environment of the ancestor retains more of its character than the other.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 09:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios