I just realized something!
Aug. 19th, 2004 09:31 amOne of my friends complained about how if she wanted to change all incidents of a certain user picture with another user picture, she had to give the new user picture the same keywords, even if they were unrelated.
This is not true.
User pictures can have more than one keyword, so long as keywords are separated by commas. So you can have user pictures numbered 1-whatever with an additional keyword (separated by a comma from the number!) describing the picture itself.
I'm not sure how this'd work for replacement uses, though. So she's probably right after all. But I'm just happy, I learned something new!
This is not true.
User pictures can have more than one keyword, so long as keywords are separated by commas. So you can have user pictures numbered 1-whatever with an additional keyword (separated by a comma from the number!) describing the picture itself.
I'm not sure how this'd work for replacement uses, though. So she's probably right after all. But I'm just happy, I learned something new!
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 09:46 am (UTC)1,firstuserpic
2,seconduserpic
3,thirduserpic
You replace the first user picture with a new graphic and give it the keywords "1,newuserpic"
Every entry and comment where you selected "1" as the keyword will be replaced. Every entry and comment where you selected "firstuserpic" as the keyword will be replaced with your default userpic until you upload a userpic and give it the name "firstuserpic."
This is why I try to name my userpics by topic/mood/message, rather than content. I've already replaced my Holidays userpic a couple of times, depending on what I want to use for that particular season.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 02:16 pm (UTC)Every entry and comment where you selected "1" as the keyword will be replaced. Every entry and comment where you selected "firstuserpic" as the keyword will be replaced with your default userpic until you upload a userpic and give it the name "firstuserpic."
Drat, and here I thought she had found the perfect solution. Oh well...
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 07:43 pm (UTC)Still, it would've been nice.