Oh, and here's the criteria:

[conuly]

Write a paper in which you defend cultural relativism against James Rachels' criticism of this theory in "Morality is Not Relative." In your paper you should do the following. First, clearly explain what the issue is over the status of moral truths. Second, clearly explain the three theories of moral truths: objectivism, cultural relativism, and subjective relativism. Third, clearly state the cultural difference argument in support of cultural relativism. Fourht, clearly explain Rachels' objection to the cultural difference argument. And fifth, clearly explain how a cultural relativist (such as yourself) could reasonable (sic) respond to Rachel's (sic) objection.

You must use appropriate quotations from the text to illustrate and support your ideas.

Well, crap. This guy HAS no appropriate quotations. He's completely unquotable! Seriously. *sighs*

Comments

[conuly]

Have you considered taking "adult education" classes? You don't have to go part-time, even, just take a spare class here or there, desensitize yourself. And learn something new.