![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
conuly
Isn't this illegal?
I'm sure there's an amendment about that... Let's see... *dredges up the 10th grade*
1. Speech, press, religion, assembly and petition
2. Bear arms
3. No quartering of soldiers in peacetime
4. No unreasonable search/seizures, "just cause"
5. No self-incriminating statements, no double jeopardy
6. Speedy, impartial jury trial
7. Trial by jury for civil suits >$20
8. No excessive bail, no cruel and unusual punishments
9. This list doesn't mean there aren't other rights
10. Rights not covered by the constitution are ceded to the states
I'm sure there's an amendment about that... Let's see... *dredges up the 10th grade*
1. Speech, press, religion, assembly and petition
2. Bear arms
3. No quartering of soldiers in peacetime
4. No unreasonable search/seizures, "just cause"
5. No self-incriminating statements, no double jeopardy
6. Speedy, impartial jury trial
7. Trial by jury for civil suits >$20
8. No excessive bail, no cruel and unusual punishments
9. This list doesn't mean there aren't other rights
10. Rights not covered by the constitution are ceded to the states
no subject
Date: 2004-08-16 08:17 pm (UTC)That doesn't make any sense. Judges are appointed, not elected.
And I do think that this constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure. I really, truly do. I can decide for myself if I think it's constitutional, just so long as I realize that this matters not a whit in the making of public policy.