Poll #19286 DS9 Question
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 18
What do you think of the episode "Move Along Home"?
View Answers
LOVE IT OMG IT IS THE BEST!
2 (11.1%)
Well, it's okay.
4 (22.2%)
It's not great, but I don't get the hate for it
11 (61.1%)
HATE IT
1 (5.6%)
KILL IT WITH FIRE
0 (0.0%)
To hear people talk, you'd think it was another "Spock's Brain" or "Threshold"!
no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 05:32 am (UTC)Threshold, on the other hand, made me scream. (That's the Star Trek Veeger, er, Voyager one, right? Where they turn into giant newts? Because the thing that made me scream the most, aside from "that is plainly devolving, you twerps, not evolving!" and other eye-rolling bits, was they didn't take the babies back! I mean, look, you know how to revert the newts to people, but NO, there was shying away from the complicated to leave human-descended life forms on an alien planet! *screams*)
no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 07:22 am (UTC)But that ep is stupid for other reasons.
no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 08:59 pm (UTC)It's not a good episode, but for my money there are worse episodes of first, and even second, possibly even third, season DS9.
no subject
Date: 2018-01-09 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-10 05:00 am (UTC)...right after I feed the Risian Dance Instructors to the Borg.)
I think Voyager really failed for me in trying to be episodic, resetting everything nearly-back-to-default, rather than at least having character arcs/complications early in there, such as could've been done by catching and bringing along the poor little newtlings. (I really like Seven of Nine, though. Even more from playing a Libborg... *halo*)
no subject
Date: 2018-01-10 05:49 am (UTC)I'd be surprised if the loss of sapience were a "natural progression" of humanity without some seriously weird gengineering.
Human intelligence comes with some seriously high costs - it makes childbirth AND infancy extremely risky, it makes us inordinately dependent on our parents and grandparents for a very long period of time (meaning human societies have to spend energy taking care of individuals who aren't very productive just so they can increase the survival odds of the young), and all that brainpower costs a lot of energy.
"Big brains" is an evolutionary gamble that has paid off hugely for us thus far, but maybe there's a reason not many species have gone this route. And it's not really necessary. I mean, sure, humans are an astonishingly successful species - but so are fruit flies, and they don't have much in the way of brains.
Of course, humans do tend to select for intelligence (at least a little), so you're right, even if it becomes a massive liability then you wouldn't expect to see it go away, not even if we had an "island population" of humans, like those elephants that become tiny or those mice that become enormous or all those flightless birds... but two individuals can't evolve anyway. Calling Janeway and Paris' transformation "evolution" is ridiculous. They changed due to weird technobabble, not evolution in any sense of the word.
But what they did not do is revert to an earlier ancestral state, which is what devolution would be if such a thing existed. Which it doesn't.
I think Voyager really failed for me in trying to be episodic, resetting everything nearly-back-to-default, rather than at least having character arcs/complications early in there, such as could've been done by catching and bringing along the poor little newtlings. (I really like Seven of Nine, though. Even more from playing a Libborg... *halo*)
I would've done Voyager so differently, like OMG. They threw away the Maquis "two teams forced to work together", they threw away Seska (so pissed about that) in favor of "lol, Cardassians, they're so backstabby!!!", they made Neelix a clown....
no subject
Date: 2018-01-11 04:43 am (UTC)YES THAT. I mean, even if that were some kind of possible human end-state, the human tendency to select for sapience (at least enough to operate a replicator!) would tend to count against it...
Though on the "devolution" scale, regressing to giant newts would seem to seem to be evoking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procynosuchus ? ...I wonder if the original draft was a "regression" thing, which would've made more trope-sense, anyway, passing through a chimp-ish state of "must steal status female" poor impulse control before fulling regressing to a Procynosuchus-like form and brainz. I mean, it'd still be technobabble, but the tropes would be more satisfying.
My impression of the early season(s) of Veeger were: "I like most of the actors and Mulgrew is OMG, but my gods, what are the writers SMOKING?" But yeah, consequences of the set-up, punching-down on Neelix, raaaargh!
(I started liking Talaxians -- to my utter surprise -- when they showed up in a STO mission series and I realized they were space hobbits. Bam. Everything makes sense. They're little space hobbits. They like food. They like company. They're congenital civilians (okay, except the player character ones). Now I just want to pat them all on the head and set them up in the Shire so they can be happy.)
no subject
Date: 2018-01-11 07:22 am (UTC)In relation to the comments above wouldn't say I love Spock's Brain but there are, imo, worse TOS episodes. Omega Glory and Assignment:Earth count amongst them. And we'll always have 'what is brain!'....
no subject
Date: 2018-01-11 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-15 02:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-15 02:30 am (UTC)