Damn, this is not the sort of rhetoric I expect from USA Today

[conuly]

A president who'd all but call a senator a whore is unfit to clean toilets in Obama's presidential library or to shine George W. Bush's shoes

LOL, that poll. Who the hell is scrolling to the bottom just to say they "don't know" how they feel about the editorial? Look, either you think Trump is the scum of the earth, or (somehow) the salt of the earth. How can you still be undecided about this!?

Comments

[redbird]

If we did, they'd probably have been written in 1787, like the minimal ones we have now, and add something like property ownership to the list. Or 1887, and might specify that only white men were eligible. (I'm fairly sure the only thing the constitution rules out is a religious test, though there are certainly people who won't vote for anyone who [they think] isn't a Christian, as well as people who won't vote for a non-white, or a woman (and not all of them are the same people.))