Stolen from
feminist_rage
Jun. 2nd, 2004 12:39 amIt's a new serial adder! I'll link to him when I'm done criticizing.
I'm on a mission. I'm using liveournal to show you that not all men are bad.
Spoiler alert, but he does nothing of the sort. He doesn't mention men at all!
Women are self-centered, rude, and insensitive.
And yet, just about every one of us has more sense than to form THAT sentence and call ourselves bastions of manners.
They think the world revolves around them and their gender issues.
Nope. I think the world revolves around the sun. It's called science.
Ugh. Spare me.
Ugh, spare me? I haven't heard that since high school. Actually, only really ditzy girls said that, like Charlotte (I'll have to tell you about her someday...)
Women have spent the last 3 decades trying to redefine themselves.
Um, no, people have spent the past thirty years trying to redefine society.
It doesn't take 30 years to do this. Get over yourselves.
*blinkblink* Should I start spouting stats yet?
You don't want to celebrate gender differences.
*deepsigh* You're actually right. I want to celebrate individuality instead, which has nothing (or very little) to do with gender.
You want to hack and slice and reinvent the wheel, but you don't want the responsibilities.
I have no idea what it means, but I think it's wrong.
For example, you dont' want women in combat. That's a mans job.
*laughs* Actually, I don't want men in combat either. And I think that if you are choosing to join the military, and you're qualified for a combat position, you should get it. Qualification shouldn't depend on gender.
When it gets down to it, the crappiest jobs on earth are still mostly performed by men, and that's the way it should be according to you.
The crappiest job on earth is diaper changing, and women do most of that. Next crappiest probably has to be housework in general after a fulltime job, and women do most of THAT. Then there's prostitution (mostly female), maid service (mostly female), and garbageman (okay, that's mostly male, but it pays well).
For example, a female soldier gets killed in Iraq, and her two enlisted sisters want to bail out and run home.
Wasn't that the plot of Saving Private Ryan?
I would hate to tell you how many families lost all of their sons and fathers in past wars.
Women died in those wars too. Not just civilians, women were there as nurses and whatnot. And women have died in this war. And yes, some families lose all their sons, and some lose all their fathers (WTF?), but similarly, some lose all their daughters and their multiple mothers.
But it's different because of the gender issue.
Not according to any woman I know. Okay, there's Ann Coulter, but she's fucking insane.
If you haven't gotten the point by now, you must be a woman.
What point? I thought your point was that not all men are bad. But I knew that already.
Edit: His name?
i_h8_men. Dear god. It's CHTSPK!
I'm on a mission. I'm using liveournal to show you that not all men are bad.
Spoiler alert, but he does nothing of the sort. He doesn't mention men at all!
Women are self-centered, rude, and insensitive.
And yet, just about every one of us has more sense than to form THAT sentence and call ourselves bastions of manners.
They think the world revolves around them and their gender issues.
Nope. I think the world revolves around the sun. It's called science.
Ugh. Spare me.
Ugh, spare me? I haven't heard that since high school. Actually, only really ditzy girls said that, like Charlotte (I'll have to tell you about her someday...)
Women have spent the last 3 decades trying to redefine themselves.
Um, no, people have spent the past thirty years trying to redefine society.
It doesn't take 30 years to do this. Get over yourselves.
*blinkblink* Should I start spouting stats yet?
You don't want to celebrate gender differences.
*deepsigh* You're actually right. I want to celebrate individuality instead, which has nothing (or very little) to do with gender.
You want to hack and slice and reinvent the wheel, but you don't want the responsibilities.
I have no idea what it means, but I think it's wrong.
For example, you dont' want women in combat. That's a mans job.
*laughs* Actually, I don't want men in combat either. And I think that if you are choosing to join the military, and you're qualified for a combat position, you should get it. Qualification shouldn't depend on gender.
When it gets down to it, the crappiest jobs on earth are still mostly performed by men, and that's the way it should be according to you.
The crappiest job on earth is diaper changing, and women do most of that. Next crappiest probably has to be housework in general after a fulltime job, and women do most of THAT. Then there's prostitution (mostly female), maid service (mostly female), and garbageman (okay, that's mostly male, but it pays well).
For example, a female soldier gets killed in Iraq, and her two enlisted sisters want to bail out and run home.
Wasn't that the plot of Saving Private Ryan?
I would hate to tell you how many families lost all of their sons and fathers in past wars.
Women died in those wars too. Not just civilians, women were there as nurses and whatnot. And women have died in this war. And yes, some families lose all their sons, and some lose all their fathers (WTF?), but similarly, some lose all their daughters and their multiple mothers.
But it's different because of the gender issue.
Not according to any woman I know. Okay, there's Ann Coulter, but she's fucking insane.
If you haven't gotten the point by now, you must be a woman.
What point? I thought your point was that not all men are bad. But I knew that already.
Edit: His name?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-01 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-01 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-01 10:10 pm (UTC)And the idea of killing stupid people with my brain is just plain cool. It would be even cooler if I could do it over the internet.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-01 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-01 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-02 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-01 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-01 10:25 pm (UTC)Weirdos all around us!
Date: 2004-06-01 10:15 pm (UTC)No, seriously
Date: 2004-06-01 10:20 pm (UTC)Seriously, what planet?
Yes, seriously
Date: 2004-06-01 10:38 pm (UTC)I can't make up some of the weirder stuff he posted... There's only one current post of his on Google, unfortunately, but it's absolutely representative of his strange beliefs:
http://www.shef.ac.uk/~psysc/psa-public-sphere/msg00620.html
Re: Yes, seriously
Date: 2004-06-01 10:48 pm (UTC)Re: Yes, seriously
Date: 2004-06-02 12:29 am (UTC)Conuly, love the journal!
~Shari
Re: Yes, seriously
Date: 2004-06-02 04:34 am (UTC)Re: Weirdos all around us!
Date: 2004-06-01 10:22 pm (UTC)*stares*
Re: Weirdos all around us!
Date: 2004-06-01 10:30 pm (UTC)http://www.pincsf.org/news31.html
Fruedians are some fucked-up dudes, especially when it comes to their wrong-as-hell ideas about autism.
I will have to ask people if they're actually serious.
Re: Weirdos all around us!
Date: 2004-06-01 11:39 pm (UTC)Group 1: Punctuation is facsist, dictionaries are the tools of the oppressor!
Group 2: Use a spell-checker, you selfish twerps!
Larry Lyons: You know, the reason you're all angry is because your mother masturbated you to sleep every night and you secretly miss that.
*snickers, ducks, and runs away*
The door is open... the punch line needs to be said...
Date: 2004-06-01 11:51 pm (UTC)Re: Weirdos all around us!
Date: 2004-06-02 05:35 am (UTC)