![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
See, this is what I keep telling certain people (none of whom are you, by the way)! It's not my prefered solution (which is to go back to a safe distance and start laughing at the afflicted), but it's the one that works. It also is far kinder than my prefered solution, which some might call cruel.
Aug. 6th, 2005
1. Everyone out there is biased. It doesn't matter how detailed their statistics, how well-designed their webpages, they're omitting some information from how they write about their statistics, hoping you won't notice it.
2. To make things worse, hardly anybody is willing to do their own research. If you use one search criteria, you find a thousands sites which all get their information from one site. If you use another set of criteria, they use a different site for their information, but they're just as copycatting. On, and on, and on it goes.
3. Most of these sites don't have information more recent than two years ago.
4. I have a headache.
Seriously, though, I suspect there's this one real lesson to be learned: All sides (I suspect it's far more complicated than just two sides) think they're right, and they probably are, at least in a few important ways. Unfortunately, this information probably won't go over very well with anybody. I should keep it to myself.
I wonder if this applies to other situations in life?
2. To make things worse, hardly anybody is willing to do their own research. If you use one search criteria, you find a thousands sites which all get their information from one site. If you use another set of criteria, they use a different site for their information, but they're just as copycatting. On, and on, and on it goes.
3. Most of these sites don't have information more recent than two years ago.
4. I have a headache.
Seriously, though, I suspect there's this one real lesson to be learned: All sides (I suspect it's far more complicated than just two sides) think they're right, and they probably are, at least in a few important ways. Unfortunately, this information probably won't go over very well with anybody. I should keep it to myself.
I wonder if this applies to other situations in life?
Finally saw yesterday's BSG...
Aug. 6th, 2005 07:09 pm
(I was asleep as it aired, bad me!)
( Read more... )
I prefered last week, though. I think I'm the only one who does.
( Read more... )
I prefered last week, though. I think I'm the only one who does.
Society is in decline!
Aug. 6th, 2005 10:38 pm
Serva me! Serva me! Undae magnae sunt!
(I love that line. Latin for Americans, people!)
I hate that argument. Loathe and abhor it. Do you know how many times I've heard some self-righteous little mind cry that society is in decline? Wish I knew. And when I read back through the pitiful collection of historical documents I, um, read through, guess what? That's the unifying thread. No matter when or where you are, somebody is there getting up on a soapbox and declaring that society is in decline, that children don't obey their parents, that life was better when they were young, and it's a crying shame that we should Do Something About.
The books are all wrong now, the winters are too short, and we don't get proper sunlight nowadays. Why, when I was a young whippersnapper, I hiked three miles, in the snow, just to get to school, and I was happy for it! Uphill, both ways!
People were saying that before there were schools, and it was a lie then just like it's a lie now.
Society can't possibly be in constant decline. We'd've noticed. Among other things, at this point we'd all be pointing, grunting, and having sex with our brothers and sisters. Instead, what we've got here is a classic case of overexcited hyperbole by somebody who doesn't like Harry Potter, and who thinks that's linked to the current decline of society.
I wonder if I should take my time to argue. All this has happened before, and will happen again, right? (Look at me, all Ms. Pop-Culture-referency!) So I could correct her, but another three would take her place (and you know what I blame that on the breakdown of? Society!). So it's a bit of a waste of time, really.
Still irritates me. A lot. Grr.
As for "what is literature", that's just a stupid question. I note that nowadays many people reference Uncle Tom's Cabin as literature. I've read that. It's a piece of well-written, fairly-honest, useful propaganda, but I wouldn't deign to call it literature. I do suppose it's better than anything about a boy called Tom Swift, though.... (But, gasp, at least they didn't have Famous Harry Potter to idolize then!)
And now he says, when I call him out on his sexist, ageist, and racist language (and I still think that was racist): You're not the boss of me! This is a free country! And other such playground classics from the man who wants us all to graduate "highschool". I've removed myself from the discussion, because he apparently doesn't realize that it doesn't matter whether I rule the world or not, that sort of thing is not acceptable. We've all refrained from commenting on his age, race, gender, sexuality, the whole of it, the worse any of us has done is called him "stupid". He gets to try to do the same now. Fair's fair, right?
(I love that line. Latin for Americans, people!)
I hate that argument. Loathe and abhor it. Do you know how many times I've heard some self-righteous little mind cry that society is in decline? Wish I knew. And when I read back through the pitiful collection of historical documents I, um, read through, guess what? That's the unifying thread. No matter when or where you are, somebody is there getting up on a soapbox and declaring that society is in decline, that children don't obey their parents, that life was better when they were young, and it's a crying shame that we should Do Something About.
The books are all wrong now, the winters are too short, and we don't get proper sunlight nowadays. Why, when I was a young whippersnapper, I hiked three miles, in the snow, just to get to school, and I was happy for it! Uphill, both ways!
People were saying that before there were schools, and it was a lie then just like it's a lie now.
Society can't possibly be in constant decline. We'd've noticed. Among other things, at this point we'd all be pointing, grunting, and having sex with our brothers and sisters. Instead, what we've got here is a classic case of overexcited hyperbole by somebody who doesn't like Harry Potter, and who thinks that's linked to the current decline of society.
I wonder if I should take my time to argue. All this has happened before, and will happen again, right? (Look at me, all Ms. Pop-Culture-referency!) So I could correct her, but another three would take her place (and you know what I blame that on the breakdown of? Society!). So it's a bit of a waste of time, really.
Still irritates me. A lot. Grr.
As for "what is literature", that's just a stupid question. I note that nowadays many people reference Uncle Tom's Cabin as literature. I've read that. It's a piece of well-written, fairly-honest, useful propaganda, but I wouldn't deign to call it literature. I do suppose it's better than anything about a boy called Tom Swift, though.... (But, gasp, at least they didn't have Famous Harry Potter to idolize then!)
And now he says, when I call him out on his sexist, ageist, and racist language (and I still think that was racist): You're not the boss of me! This is a free country! And other such playground classics from the man who wants us all to graduate "highschool". I've removed myself from the discussion, because he apparently doesn't realize that it doesn't matter whether I rule the world or not, that sort of thing is not acceptable. We've all refrained from commenting on his age, race, gender, sexuality, the whole of it, the worse any of us has done is called him "stupid". He gets to try to do the same now. Fair's fair, right?