If it weren't for the context, the irony could almost be funny.

[conuly]

While the NRA Was on TV Talking About the Need for More Guns Some Guy Was Walking Up and Down a Road in Pennsylvania Shooting People

http://gawker.com/5970497/while-the-nra-was-on-tv-talking-about-the-need-for-more-guns-some-guy-was-walking-up-and-down-a-road-in-pennsylvania-shooting-people

Comments

[conuly]

I have to say, that link does not seem like a particularly unbiased source. Not because of the conclusion the author comes to, but because of the language choices used. I'm not qualified to judge the authors sources or conclusions, but I have trouble trusting a source that may have come to the conclusion before even looking at the data. The conclusion may be right, but how could I tell?