conuly: (disaster)
[personal profile] conuly
(And I have no intention of going through the series in one big lump either. Book 1 is fine for their ages, but book 7? NOT EVEN CLOSE. I'm going to stretch it out a bit.)

Reading any of my Old Favorites is like this, and one reason I insist on reading a chapter book with them even as they're outgrowing daily doses of shared picture books. (Well, Ana is, she reads them on her own mostly now, Evangeline still needs it because she can't read yet... but we'll get on this in a minute.) But Harry Potter is, well, Harry Potter. It has had so much massive (massive) discussion.... Well!

And now this leaves me with dilemmas. Should I point out to the nieces the small size of Harry's year (along with the fannish muttering that this implies a massive die-off and lack of births during and just after the first war)? Should I mention all the meaningful names as they show up? Like, if we get to PoA, should I point out that Remus is basically named Wolfy McWolfman? (A name like that is just asking for trouble. It's like Swiper on Dora. WHAT was his mom THINKING? If she'd named him "Giver" or "Sweetie" instead he'd never be a pain!) Should I mention what we know about Dean Thomas from interviews, namely that his dad was a wizard who got killed for turning down the DE? Man, I feel like one of those people who worries that their child might grow up thinking Greedo shot first!

Of course, I can't even remotely do accents when reading, so I feel silly every time I get to one of them whose accent is clearly spelled out (mostly Hagrid). How do other people handle accents when reading, anyway?

As far as Evangeline goes, I asked her teacher what level she is so I can clear out some of our older books (which I'll do when she goes back to school - she and her sister are home sick today), and her teacher said "D". This is pretty much where she ought to be at the end of this year, so I'm not concerned - she's not at all behind, nor is she so far ahead that she's likely to be bored.

Except yesterday I caught her reading "The Fire Cat", which is... not D level. But I'm thinking she may have had it partially memorized.

Ana, for her part, has discovered a profound addiction to graphic novels. She started with Rapunzel and now... sheesh. I know precious little about graphic novels for her age, but I'm learning fast!

Well, that last part was random. Let's get back to what's important - Harry Potter, and also - what are we reading next? (No, really. What ARE we reading next?)

Date: 2011-03-22 05:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grammaravenger.livejournal.com
Yeah, I think I agree with this. They'll almost certainly read the books again when they're older, and pick up on a lot of new things then. Then they'll probably come running to you all excited and you can dump more of the fannish knowledge that isn't in the books on them!

Also, um, I never realized that thing about Harry's class being unusually small. I did realize that there was a huge mismatch between the size of Harry's class (not that many, however many it was) and the stated size of Hogwarts (1000 students?! impossible!). I just figured that J.K. Rowling was bad at math or something, I guess. Was it ever explicitly stated that other classes were significantly larger than Harry's? If it was, I totally missed it.

Date: 2011-03-22 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ncp.livejournal.com
Rowling is HORRIBLE at math. She's admitted it publicly.

As far as class size goes, it's likely that many of the classes before Harry's were also small. Voldemort had been in power for ten years or so by then. There may have been a huge baby boom the year after Ginny's. It's also likely that Teddy Lupin's year is pretty small as well.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 2021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 03:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios