![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And it's in this way that I've discovered and re-discovered several classic/vintage kid's books.
Is it just me, or have children's chapter books become more... um... well, for lack of a better term, more arc-based in recent years? I'm reading one that has its reading level neatly marked on the back (5th grade), published in 1975, and each chapter is a self-contained story. Nowadays, it seems like all the chapter books, even the ones for first graders, are one whole story, not several. But this is far from the only one where each chapter was self-contained, or nearly so. Compare Ramona to Clementine, or Pippi Longstocking to... well, you can't compare Pippi Longstocking to anybody, I guess, but find someone.
And of course there were chapter books of the other sort back then too - certainly there's a coherent plot in Half Magic (even if each chapter *is* about a separate adventure) or in The Secret Garden - but... oh, I don't know. Maybe I'm just making things up in my head? Or reading the wrong newer fiction?
Is it just me, or have children's chapter books become more... um... well, for lack of a better term, more arc-based in recent years? I'm reading one that has its reading level neatly marked on the back (5th grade), published in 1975, and each chapter is a self-contained story. Nowadays, it seems like all the chapter books, even the ones for first graders, are one whole story, not several. But this is far from the only one where each chapter was self-contained, or nearly so. Compare Ramona to Clementine, or Pippi Longstocking to... well, you can't compare Pippi Longstocking to anybody, I guess, but find someone.
And of course there were chapter books of the other sort back then too - certainly there's a coherent plot in Half Magic (even if each chapter *is* about a separate adventure) or in The Secret Garden - but... oh, I don't know. Maybe I'm just making things up in my head? Or reading the wrong newer fiction?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 04:21 am (UTC)That would be neat.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 04:37 am (UTC)Maybe it just reflects general trends.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 06:23 am (UTC)I have, however, noticed that's true for the original Star Trek series vs. the Next Generation, and even more so, Deep Space Nine and Voyager. Hardly the same thing, but that's what stands out more in my mind as an example of something having standalone "episodes" or "chapters" rather than a major story arc.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 06:35 am (UTC)The Clementine books take place over a few days each. Each chapter is very tightly tied to the next.
The Ramona books do have an overarching theme for each book, but little is lost by reading a chapter separately and independently of the rest.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 07:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 09:00 pm (UTC)Btw there's a clear contrast analyzed in a review of the book version of THE LION, THE WITCH, AND THE WARDROBE vs the movie. The book was pretty loose/ambiance/theme. The movie added a tight plot of currently conventional family dynamic in front of that background. Long review but worth it.
http://www.andrewrilstone.com/2006/01/lion-witch-and-wardrobe_08.html
no subject
Date: 2010-11-15 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-14 12:12 pm (UTC)Ransome was just the opposite: seamless arc in each book, continuity in the series. Narnia too.
These latter had a lot of variety within each book, but in general I prefer the looser structure of the older classics: more variety, more suspense because less predictable, more like jumbled real life rather than artificially tidy.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-15 02:48 am (UTC)But I don't actually know if it is happening in children's books. It would just make sense if it were.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-15 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-15 03:09 am (UTC)... I wonder how many do come out each year.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-15 03:13 am (UTC)I also have a general impression that books are getting thicker (not that there never were heavyweight books, just that more of them are long and in-depth), but if that's the case I blame/praise Harry Potter. Rowling could've used more editing, but she did open the door to 700 page children's/teen novels.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-15 03:29 am (UTC)